pclayton, on Oct 10 2007, 10:52 AM, said:
I would pass. Double is penalty. If we are making 3♠, we are beating 3♣.
If we are making 3S, don't we have to double 3C at this vulnerability to be able to win any IMP's (Unless it goes -3 or more)? Even if we are only making 2S, we're still losing a couple of IMP's if 3C is only -1, but X would push (or win, if -2) the board.
Or are you just treating this as a risk vs. reward scenario? Where the gain from doubling may not offset the risk of it making?
I think we beat 3C by two tricks, so I double and lead a trump. What the heck, they've made doubled contracts before.