BBO Discussion Forums: easy one for a change - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

easy one for a change

Poll: your bid? (21 member(s) have cast votes)

your bid?

  1. 3 spades (3 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  2. 3 NT (15 votes [71.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 71.43%

  3. 4 clubs (3 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  4. 4 diamonds (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. 4 hearts (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-September-28, 15:50

Scoring: IMP

S - W - N - E
1♠-ps-2♣-ps
3♣-ps-3♥-ps
??

0

#2 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-September-28, 17:36

DNE - 3♥ over 2♣ please.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#3 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-September-28, 21:31

I abstain as well, this one was indeed easier.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#4 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-September-28, 21:41

I'd go 3N
0

#5 User is offline   bhall 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 216
  • Joined: 2007-April-29

Posted 2007-September-28, 22:06

Well, I guess this must be a 2/1 GF auction, or 3♣ might be passed. Now I have to worry that 3N might be passed, since partner can have no idea that I hold such a moose.

I would hope that 4♣ was minorwood (RKC), but if not, I would try 4♦.
just plain Bill
0

#6 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-September-29, 01:26

Jlall, on Sep 29 2007, 05:41 AM, said:

I'd go 3N

Me too.

My hand is nice, but lacking aces. Heart values in partner's hand wasn't exactly what I'd like to hear. 3NT implies (slow) diamond values. If partner goes on I'll cooperate.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#7 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-September-29, 02:42

I belive this 3♣ shows extras (15-20), so it's forcing. A direct 3♥ over 2♣ would be more like 18-20. Right, Gonzalo?

Anyway, 3NT now :rolleyes:
0

#8 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-September-29, 03:28

sorry for not explaining, 2♣ is GF, 3♣ shows 4 cards or more but nothing else.
0

#9 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-September-29, 15:24

I bid 3NT, but I found it not so obvious, and took my time.

This ended up with UI problem and althou I think partner's reopening of 3NT is rather obvious, he decided not to.

partner had

♠
♥AJ9x
♦Jxx
♣KQJ1092
0

#10 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,580
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2007-September-29, 15:47

Well, you've only got yourself to blame here.

Your slow 3NT bid suggested that 3NT may not be the right conract, and let's look at things from partner's point of view:

a) Void in your first suit
:lol: Jxx in the unbid suit, a notable weakness
c) Not many undisclosed values, given that 2C was game forcing.

I certainly wouldn't argue with partner's pass.
0

#11 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-September-29, 15:50

yeah, I blame myself, I need to act faster :lol:
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users