BBO Discussion Forums: spades - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

spades

#1 User is offline   jocdelevat 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 322
  • Joined: 2006-February-27

Posted 2007-September-29, 08:17


Scoring: IMP


West North East South

 Pass  2♣    Pass  2♦
 Pass  2NT   Pass  3♥
 Pass  4♥    Pass  4♠
 Pass  Pass  Pass  


Hi all

1.do you respond 2d or 2s?
2. after 2nt do you bid 3h or 4h?
3.whats the corect auction with this hands?

*4h partner misunderstand the 3h bid.
*I play 2d waiting 2h negative
It's not what you are, it's how you say it!

best regards
jocdelevat
0

#2 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,274
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2007-September-29, 08:43

I think my auction would go something like this:

2♣:2♦ (2♠ is tempting but suit is poor)
2N:3♠
4♠:5♦ cue
4nt and so on
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
0

#3 User is offline   Quantumcat 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 944
  • Joined: 2007-April-11
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Bathurst, Australia
  • Interests:Archery, classical guitar, piano, watercolour painting, programming, french

Posted 2007-September-29, 09:07

The following are a beginner's thoughts, they are probably wrong:

If you add your points, 23 + 5 + 3 for singleton gives just on 31, if you feel lucky and want to try for slam, maybe you could bid:

2♣ - 2♦
2NT - 3♥
4♥ = some sort of super accept with 4 spades and 4 hearts?

It gets a bit tricky. There are hands where he has the required 23 points but you are missing 2 aces, he might have ♠KQxx, ♥KQJx, ♦KQx, ♣AK for example. He has to have at least 1 ace and the king of spades for his points so you'll always make 5♠/5NT.

Bid blackwood (regular will do, he has to have the king of spades) to find out he has 3 aces. You have 12 tricks unless they lead a diamond and spades not 2-1, if the queen was in diamonds and they led it you would have 12 tricks too, but if the queen was in diamonds and they didn't lead it you could have problems. But anyway, you have a good chance of having 12 tricks, I would bid 6♠ rather than 6NT just in case you need an extra trick somewhere, probably a lot of the field will stop in 4♠ so that's a good enough score.
I ♦ Transfers
0

#4 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2007-September-29, 09:49

2c-2d; (the close to standard agreement for a suit bid here is 2 of the top 3 honors, it's not universal, but a good rule of thumb)
2n-4h (texas transfer to spades. most play that after a 2c opener, 2d response and 2n rebid the same systems are played as over a 2n opener)
4s-? (now... well... i think i just pass. clearly the slam is on. In an established partnership opener may somehow superaccept the texas transfer. 2d response typically shows some sort of positive feature, so slam exploration may be worthwhile from the opener's perspective)
0

#5 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,580
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2007-September-29, 11:11

I'd be playing 4S on these cards as well :P
0

#6 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-September-29, 11:52

If North is going to cue bid, then 4♣ is better than 4♥. I can visualize:

2♣ - 2♦ (this suit isn't good enough for a positive)
2N - 3♥
4♣ - 4♦

You should be able to get there from here.

If North doesn't cue, my plan for the South hand would be:

... ....
2N - 3♥
3♠ - 4♠

which is a mild slam try. This seems accurate opposite a 22-24 hand.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#7 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-September-29, 12:02

pclayton, on Sep 29 2007, 07:52 PM, said:

If North is going to cue bid, then 4♣ is better than 4♥. I can visualize:

2♣ - 2♦ (this suit isn't good enough for a positive)
2N - 3♥
4♣ - 4♦

You should be able to get there from here.

Skipping the first two bids, this is exactly how I'd bid it with my regular partner. (2NT=22-24).
With pick-up partners I'd expect to copy your auction.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#8 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-September-29, 12:15

I agree with

2C - 2D
2NT - 3H
4C - 4D

We always superaccept with the cheapest suit bid, here 4C. 3NT would show a good hand for spades but only 3-card support.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#9 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-September-29, 13:17

Hmm, it looks to me as if everyone is biased by seeing opener's hand (or assuming non-standard methods). Assuming I play transfers and texas transfer over the 2N rebid, I am pretty sure my auction would be
2C 2D 2N 4H 4S
3H transfer followed by 4S invites partner to bid slam even when he has only 2-card support, responder's hand clearly isn't good enough for that. Responder probably wants to make an "accept if you have an excellent fit AND good cards"-slam try, but that doesn't exist in standard methods.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#10 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-September-29, 13:21

We don't play Texas Arend. B)
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#11 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-September-29, 14:07

Hannie, on Sep 29 2007, 09:21 PM, said:

We don't play Texas Arend. :lol:

Neither do I.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#12 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2007-September-29, 14:27

Texas is virtually unknown here in the UK. A 4H bid in response to 2NT would get the dummy.

(South African Texas where 4C showing a slam try in hearts, 4D a slam try in spades, is seen sometimes - I play it - but is not very common)
0

#13 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-September-29, 14:40

I prefer super accepts over 3red to be trick sources not cuebids.
0

#14 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-September-29, 14:51

Jlall, on Sep 29 2007, 10:40 PM, said:

I prefer super accepts over 3red to be trick sources not cuebids.

Do you play that over 1NT too, Justin?
I know Brogeland-Sĉlensminde on the Norwegian open team for Shanghai do.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#15 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,228
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-September-29, 16:05

Hi,

#1 2D is fine
#2 3H is fine and it is transfer
#3 opener should break the transfer, with 4C,
after which I most likely just bid 4S.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users