BBO Discussion Forums: Finessing Terminology - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Finessing Terminology Deep, double, etc

#1 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2007-September-27, 10:52

I recently discovered that a local expert has a different understanding of the term "double finesse". He also used the term "combination finesse", which I hadn't heard before, is it a valid term?

What term describes the finessing possibility with the following card combinations?

AJ9 opposite xxx
AQ9 opposite xxx
AQT opposite xxx
AJT opposite xxx
0

#2 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-September-27, 11:16

According to The Official Encyclopeida of Bridge the first two are Deep Finesses (you finesse for more than two outstanding honours/cards). The latter two are Double Finesses (you finesse for two outstanding honours/cards).
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#3 User is offline   ralph23 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 701
  • Joined: 2007-July-11

Posted 2007-September-27, 11:28

There is also of course the "two-way finesse" which some people tend to confuse with the Double Finesse. The 2-way is e.g.

AT9

KJ8

Who has the Queen?

Bridge World glossary defines "Combination finesse" as:

(1) a finesse against more than one card;

(2) a simple finesse preliminary to another finesse in the same suit.


So it appears to be a generic term that would encompass both the deep and the double finesse. Although I am far from confident that it is used with such precision in most cases.
Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that other philosophers are all jackasses. He usually proves it, and I should add that he also usually proves that he is one himself. H.L. Mencken.
0

#4 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-September-27, 11:37

Don't forget the backward finesse and ruffing finesse.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#5 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2007-September-27, 11:50

What about the intra-finesse? I've heard that term before, too.
Kevin Fay
0

#6 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2007-September-27, 12:00

Oh yeah, and the Chinese finesse. ;)
Kevin Fay
0

#7 User is offline   ralph23 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 701
  • Joined: 2007-July-11

Posted 2007-September-27, 12:06

kfay, on Sep 27 2007, 01:50 PM, said:

What about the intra-finesse? I've heard that term before, too.

http://www.haroldsch....com/chagas.htm
Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that other philosophers are all jackasses. He usually proves it, and I should add that he also usually proves that he is one himself. H.L. Mencken.
0

#8 User is offline   keylime 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: FD TEAM
  • Posts: 2,735
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nashville, TN
  • Interests:Motorsports, cricket, disc golf, and of course - bridge. :-)

Posted 2007-September-27, 12:33

Intrafinesse is one of my more, um, favored, terms.....
"Champions aren't made in gyms, champions are made from something they have deep inside them - a desire, a dream, a vision. They have to have last-minute stamina, they have to be a little faster, they have to have the skill and the will. But the will must be stronger than the skill. " - M. Ali
0

#9 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-September-27, 14:38

We got the term from french, so we call it 'Impass'

In Spain they say there are 2 kinds of finese

AQx-xxx = Impass
Kxx-xxx = Expass

Some old ladies also say 'ampass' (with french accent) wich actually has no sense, but sounds cool.
0

#10 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-September-27, 17:03

keylime, on Sep 27 2007, 08:33 PM, said:

Intrafinesse is one of my more, um, favored, terms.....

I thought it was the ultra-finesse ;)
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#11 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 22,142
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-September-28, 14:21

Can anyone come up with a definition for hyper-finesse? How about super-finesse and mega-finesse?

We've got all these great prefixes, and finesses are probably feeling inadequate compared to squeezes, which have great names associated with them.

#12 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2007-September-28, 15:54

practice finesse, anyone?
0

#13 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 22,142
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-September-28, 16:10

Is there a special name for the finesse often used as part of a safety play, where you have AQx(...) and first lead to the A, then later lead towards the Q? A version of this is in today's Daily Bridge Calendar. Your trumps are KJx in dummy and A9xxx in hand, and can only afford 1 loser in the suit. The recommended play is to cash the K, come back to hand and lead towards the J.

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users