BBO Discussion Forums: 8 bagger - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

8 bagger

Poll: 8 bagger (33 member(s) have cast votes)

8 bagger

  1. 2N (Ogust) (7 votes [21.21%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.21%

  2. 3C (11 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

  3. 4C (undiscussed) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. 4N (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. 5C (4 votes [12.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.12%

  6. 6C (11 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-September-18, 13:28

Last hand of an 8 board match and you are up 16. Pard opens 2♠ white / white and you look at: A, AKx, x, AKJT98xx.

Your call?
"Phil" on BBO
0

#2 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-September-18, 13:34

3♣, let partner explain a bit.
0

#3 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-September-18, 14:02

3C.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#4 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,725
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2007-September-18, 14:06

whatever I think they'll bid at the other table...

(3♣ if this is a blind guess)
Alderaan delenda est
0

#5 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-September-18, 14:10

Well, you are up 16 so if you think that the other table is in 7C then you should be in 6C, right?

Anyway, I prefer to play bridge so 3C seems clear.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#6 User is online   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,022
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2007-September-18, 14:11

If I know I am up 16, white v white... I try to think how big a catastrophe I can afford. I can blow 15 imps! Wow. Talk about a feel-good auction opportunity.

Ok... since I can afford 15 imps, and even tho the opps may be making a successful wild double, I bid what I think I may make: 6♣.

Maybe LHO will save at 6♦ :P

3♣ does nothing. Just exactly what is your plan over 3♣? Ok, maybe he'll splinter 4♥... I check for Aces (even I would use 4N here as keycard) and bid grand opposite KJxxxx x Ax xxxx.

I might try for this miracle if I couldn't afford to lose 11 imps by missing the grand.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#7 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-September-18, 14:25

If you bid 3♣, pard tries 3♦ I think.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#8 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-September-18, 14:38

I would bid 6C. We cannot lose 16 imps by playing 6C.
0

#9 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-September-18, 14:46

What if you go 1 down and opps make 5♣X?

5♣ seems safer than the slam.
0

#10 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-September-18, 14:47

whereagles, on Sep 18 2007, 03:46 PM, said:

What if you go 1 down and opps make 5♣X?

Then we do not lose 16 imps. Just for clarification 16 imps is 1300 points and the vul here is white/white.
0

#11 User is offline   keylime 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: FD TEAM
  • Posts: 2,735
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nashville, TN
  • Interests:Motorsports, cricket, disc golf, and of course - bridge. :-)

Posted 2007-September-18, 14:57

I like 6♣; I don't think this is a hand for science.
"Champions aren't made in gyms, champions are made from something they have deep inside them - a desire, a dream, a vision. They have to have last-minute stamina, they have to be a little faster, they have to have the skill and the will. But the will must be stronger than the skill. " - M. Ali
0

#12 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-September-18, 15:40

If we're 16 up 6♣ is an obvious call now. The chance for losing 16 or more is almost non-existent after that bid.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#13 User is offline   bhall 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 216
  • Joined: 2007-April-29

Posted 2007-September-18, 19:21

Ah, but you only estimate that you are up 16 - your dumb teammates may have blown back a bunch. Maybe it's 16 plus or minus 8, more likely. Now what's best?
just plain Bill
0

#14 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-September-18, 19:56

bhall, on Sep 18 2007, 08:21 PM, said:

Ah, but you only estimate that you are up 16 - your dumb teammates may have blown back a bunch. Maybe it's 16 plus or minus 8, more likely. Now what's best?

It seems likely that this was on BBO with barometer mode
0

#15 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2007-September-18, 20:22

If your opponent is sitting here, he also realizes that you "cannot lose" if you bid 6♣. But, can you?

Sure. You need to be -1300, right? Well, what if 7♠ makes but 6♣ does not? 6♣ has problems when 7♠ makes.

What if Opener has something like ♠KQJxxx ♥Jxx ♦Axx ♣x?

In 6♣, you cannot get to dummy to take advantage of the spades after a diamond lead. So, you hope for clubs to come in but catch Qxx behind. You eventually lose that club and a heart.

At 7♠, however, the worst is a heart lead. Declarer wins, clears the spade Ace, Club Ace, ruff a club (maybe high), draws spades with a cooperative split, and re-crosses in hearts to enjoy the now-established clubs.

So, I'm now afraid. 6♣ ain't working to assure the event. I need more info, the info that my opponent will seek. Hopefully I'm playing Ogust.

2NT Ogust for me.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#16 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2007-September-18, 20:41

I just came back from a cigarette and realized that his problem is actually quite humorous, at least if using my techniques.

Suppose I start with 2NT Ogust, and partner has:

♠KQJ(10)xx(x) ♥xxx(x) ♦Axx(x) ♣(x)

Something like that.

His response will be 3♠, "good hand good suit." For a "good suit," without the Ace, I expect KQ10xxx at least, and perhaps KQJxxx.

So, my next call is 4♣, asking partner to cuebid. When it maters, he will cue 4♦, showing the Ace and bringing in the grand in spades scenario.

Now, I cue 4♥. When it matters, he will cue 5♣. Whatever we have agreed, that's clearly shortness.

So, it seems that one can intelligently get to 7♠, and in an auction where the guy holding my hand will know that the alternative contract of 6♣ will be in possible jeopardy from a club stack.

There may be other ways to find out even more information, but 7♠ seems to be an imminently reachable alternative strain.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#17 User is online   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,022
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2007-September-18, 20:58

kenrexford, on Sep 18 2007, 09:22 PM, said:

If your opponent is sitting here, he also realizes that you "cannot lose" if you bid 6♣.  But, can you?

Sure.  You need to be -1300, right?  Well, what if 7♠ makes but 6♣ does not?  6♣ has problems when 7♠ makes.

What if Opener has something like ♠KQJxxx ♥Jxx ♦Axx ♣x?

In 6♣, you cannot get to dummy to take advantage of the spades after a diamond lead.  So, you hope for clubs to come in but catch Qxx behind.  You eventually lose that club and a heart.

At 7♠, however, the worst is a heart lead.  Declarer wins, clears the spade Ace, Club Ace, ruff a club (maybe high), draws spades with a cooperative split, and re-crosses in hearts to enjoy the now-established clubs.

So, I'm now afraid.  6♣ ain't working to assure the event.  I need more info, the info that my opponent will seek.  Hopefully I'm playing Ogust.

2NT Ogust for me.

if partner was bad enough to open 2♠ with KQJxxx in spades and an outside A, we probably wouldn't be up 16 imps :P And Ogust won't tell you what you need to know
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#18 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-September-18, 21:23

I bid 6♣. Caught pard with: KTxxxx, xx, QTx 7x. Got a trump lead and made 7. Owne did the same thing at the other table.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#19 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2007-September-19, 05:41

People talking about winning and losing. I don't understand how the score gets in the way of common sense.
In an 8-board match, being up 16 is 20 - 10 in VP. If you lose 15 that's all the way back to 15 - 15. Yuck. As a teammate I would not be happy with such defaitistic reasoning.

How about actually trying to be constructive?

I bid 3♣ risking to actually find out something about partner's hand.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#20 User is offline   Halo 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 875
  • Joined: 2006-June-08

Posted 2007-September-19, 08:15

6C

Seems a practical option.
0

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users