8 bagger
#1
Posted 2007-September-18, 13:28
Your call?
#3
Posted 2007-September-18, 14:02
- hrothgar
#4
Posted 2007-September-18, 14:06
(3♣ if this is a blind guess)
#5
Posted 2007-September-18, 14:10
Anyway, I prefer to play bridge so 3C seems clear.
- hrothgar
#6
Posted 2007-September-18, 14:11
Ok... since I can afford 15 imps, and even tho the opps may be making a successful wild double, I bid what I think I may make: 6♣.
Maybe LHO will save at 6♦
3♣ does nothing. Just exactly what is your plan over 3♣? Ok, maybe he'll splinter 4♥... I check for Aces (even I would use 4N here as keycard) and bid grand opposite KJxxxx x Ax xxxx.
I might try for this miracle if I couldn't afford to lose 11 imps by missing the grand.
#8 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-September-18, 14:38
#9
Posted 2007-September-18, 14:46
5♣ seems safer than the slam.
#10 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-September-18, 14:47
whereagles, on Sep 18 2007, 03:46 PM, said:
Then we do not lose 16 imps. Just for clarification 16 imps is 1300 points and the vul here is white/white.
#11
Posted 2007-September-18, 14:57
#12
Posted 2007-September-18, 15:40
Harald
#13
Posted 2007-September-18, 19:21
#14 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-September-18, 19:56
bhall, on Sep 18 2007, 08:21 PM, said:
It seems likely that this was on BBO with barometer mode
#15
Posted 2007-September-18, 20:22
Sure. You need to be -1300, right? Well, what if 7♠ makes but 6♣ does not? 6♣ has problems when 7♠ makes.
What if Opener has something like ♠KQJxxx ♥Jxx ♦Axx ♣x?
In 6♣, you cannot get to dummy to take advantage of the spades after a diamond lead. So, you hope for clubs to come in but catch Qxx behind. You eventually lose that club and a heart.
At 7♠, however, the worst is a heart lead. Declarer wins, clears the spade Ace, Club Ace, ruff a club (maybe high), draws spades with a cooperative split, and re-crosses in hearts to enjoy the now-established clubs.
So, I'm now afraid. 6♣ ain't working to assure the event. I need more info, the info that my opponent will seek. Hopefully I'm playing Ogust.
2NT Ogust for me.
-P.J. Painter.
#16
Posted 2007-September-18, 20:41
Suppose I start with 2NT Ogust, and partner has:
♠KQJ(10)xx(x) ♥xxx(x) ♦Axx(x) ♣(x)
Something like that.
His response will be 3♠, "good hand good suit." For a "good suit," without the Ace, I expect KQ10xxx at least, and perhaps KQJxxx.
So, my next call is 4♣, asking partner to cuebid. When it maters, he will cue 4♦, showing the Ace and bringing in the grand in spades scenario.
Now, I cue 4♥. When it matters, he will cue 5♣. Whatever we have agreed, that's clearly shortness.
So, it seems that one can intelligently get to 7♠, and in an auction where the guy holding my hand will know that the alternative contract of 6♣ will be in possible jeopardy from a club stack.
There may be other ways to find out even more information, but 7♠ seems to be an imminently reachable alternative strain.
-P.J. Painter.
#17
Posted 2007-September-18, 20:58
kenrexford, on Sep 18 2007, 09:22 PM, said:
Sure. You need to be -1300, right? Well, what if 7♠ makes but 6♣ does not? 6♣ has problems when 7♠ makes.
What if Opener has something like ♠KQJxxx ♥Jxx ♦Axx ♣x?
In 6♣, you cannot get to dummy to take advantage of the spades after a diamond lead. So, you hope for clubs to come in but catch Qxx behind. You eventually lose that club and a heart.
At 7♠, however, the worst is a heart lead. Declarer wins, clears the spade Ace, Club Ace, ruff a club (maybe high), draws spades with a cooperative split, and re-crosses in hearts to enjoy the now-established clubs.
So, I'm now afraid. 6♣ ain't working to assure the event. I need more info, the info that my opponent will seek. Hopefully I'm playing Ogust.
2NT Ogust for me.
if partner was bad enough to open 2♠ with KQJxxx in spades and an outside A, we probably wouldn't be up 16 imps
#18
Posted 2007-September-18, 21:23
#19
Posted 2007-September-19, 05:41
In an 8-board match, being up 16 is 20 - 10 in VP. If you lose 15 that's all the way back to 15 - 15. Yuck. As a teammate I would not be happy with such defaitistic reasoning.
How about actually trying to be constructive?
I bid 3♣ risking to actually find out something about partner's hand.

Help
