Echognome, on Sep 19 2007, 03:05 AM, said:
Hannie, on Sep 18 2007, 04:51 PM, said:
So looks like you had a good auction to a good spot.
Yeah. Just thought it an interesting hand. It felt a bit like 2
♣ was a psych. It certainly doesn't have the high cards normally promised for a 2/1.
Who cares about high cards? You make
slam 78% of the time opposite as little as
♠ Kxxxxx
♥ Axxx
♦ xx
♣ A
The only problem with responding 2
♣ followed by spade support is that opener may not show
♠Q to a keycard ask (5
♦ = 3) and 5
♥ "do you have trump queen?", simply because he can't be certain that responder has four spades.
Give opener one spade less and you do not want to bid slam.
1
♠ - 2
♣
2
♥ - 3
♠
4
♣ - 4NT
5
♦ - 5
♥
??
Opener will now deny
♠Q whether he has five or six spades, unless 3
♠ is agreed as four, 2
♠ as three. I doubt that many have that agreement.
2
♣ with the example hand is just common sense. If anyone thinks he/she doesn't have a game force opposite 1
♠, his/her judgement can only be described as poor. There is no guarantee that even 4
♠ will make, but you can't stay out of game with that hand.
Roland
1♠ - 2♣
2♥ - 3♠
4♦ - 4♠
All Pass