Garbage or not?
#1
Posted 2007-September-02, 14:46
♠Txxx ♥KQxx ♦x ♣xxxx
Pard opens a 15-17 NT. Your call.
Garbage Stayman is available by the way.
#2
Posted 2007-September-02, 15:22
pclayton, on Sep 2 2007, 10:46 PM, said:
♠Txxx ♥KQxx ♦x ♣xxxx
Pard opens a 15-17 NT. Your call.
Garbage Stayman is available by the way.
Normally I'd pass with this hand. Mainly because we have the agreement that with 3-3 in the majors the 1NT-opener pulls to 2♠ over 2♣-2♦-2♥. But it's close, and I can definitely stomach garbage Stayman on this hand.
Harald
#4
Posted 2007-September-02, 15:45
#5
Posted 2007-September-02, 16:33
- hrothgar
#7
Posted 2007-September-02, 17:23
Will partner expect you to have 8+ points?
xxx
xxx
xx
xxxx
would be an awful shape for p to have
BebopKid (Bryan Lee Williams)
"I've practiced meditation most of my life. It's better than sitting around doing nothing."
(Tom Sims, from topfive.com)
♦♦♦♦♦♦
#8
Posted 2007-September-02, 17:48
BebopKid, on Sep 2 2007, 03:23 PM, said:
Will partner expect you to have 8+ points?
xxx
xxx
xx
xxxx
would be an awful shape for p to have
ur right a 3324 would be too horrible to think about.
#9
Posted 2007-September-02, 18:11
- hrothgar
#11
Posted 2007-September-02, 20:14
BebopKid, on Sep 2 2007, 03:23 PM, said:
pclayton said:
I.e. 2♥ and partner won't expect 8 pts.
#12
Posted 2007-September-02, 20:21
The more interesting question, IMO, is whether the partnership can reach 3♣. Two possible ways seem plausible.
First, you simply bid 2♣, hear 2♦, bid 2♥, hear 2♠, and bid 3♣. Worst case, you play 3♣ opposite 2326, of course. So, perhaps not so good.
Better might be that you bid 2♣, partner bids 2♦, you bid 2♥, and partner is allowed to bid 2NT when 2245/3235/3226/2236. This would be the "right" bid IF Garbage Stayman is reserved for unbalanced hands without a five-card major or, if a 5-card major, then 3+ clubs (if correct 2♦ to 2♥).
All in all, I'm not so sure the latter works either, but it intrigues me.
-P.J. Painter.
#13
Posted 2007-September-02, 21:08
- hrothgar
#15
Posted 2007-September-03, 00:16
1N-2♣-2♦-2♥
is opener expected to pass since responder showed a 4♠5♥+ hand checking for a 4-4 fit (in which case pass is basically forced)? If so, it's too risky to try it with 4414 shape since you'll have to guess the major to correct 2♦ to and might play a 4-2 fit instead of a 4-3 fit (neither of which sounds great to me, frankly).
Alternatively, some play that a 2♥ correction shows equal length in the majors and opener should take a length preference. if you play this way, then I guess 4414 is an ok shape if you're willing to play the 4-3 fit.
#16
Posted 2007-September-03, 00:18
- R. Buckminster Fuller
#17
Posted 2007-September-03, 01:32
#18
Posted 2007-September-03, 02:57
#19
Posted 2007-September-03, 03:38
Free, on Sep 3 2007, 10:57 AM, said:
Unless 2♣ shows this hand ....
#20
Posted 2007-September-03, 07:11
BTW, "Garbage Stayman" defines 1N-2C-2D-2H = weak with 4-4 or better in the majors. This is why "Garbage Stayman" is a convention rather than a convenience for responder when responder holds a 4450 hand and will pass any opener's rebid.
If playing Garbage Stayman and responder has the 5♥/4♠ invitational hand, responder bids 2D followed by 2S, but with the 5♠/4♥ invitational hand, responder bids 2C followed by 2S over 2D.
2N by opener over 2H is NOT ALLOWED. Responder could be xxxxx xxxxx x xx. Opener must pass or correct to 2S with equal or better spades. PERIOD.

Help
