BBO Discussion Forums: bidding - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

bidding competitive auction

#1 User is online   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,286
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2007-September-06, 11:58


Dealer: East
Vul: EW
Scoring: IMP
♠ A
♥ A873
♦ Q853
♣ AJ42


West North East South

 -     -     1♣    1♦
 1♠    2♦    2♠    3♦
 Pass  Pass  Pass  


Comments on the bidding please, I dont like conceling the 4♥.
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
0

#2 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-September-06, 12:10

Are you the 1♦ overcaller? This was a fairly easy pass over 1♣, then after they bid and raised spades you could double for takeout to show your hand.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#3 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-September-06, 12:22

Yes, clear pass of 1C.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#4 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-September-06, 12:35

Obviously this was the south hand, since it's not possible from the auction that it could be any of the other three.

Agree with Josh and Han that this is an easy pass. If I for some odd reason HAD to bid over 1♣ I'd reluctantly chose 1NT - not that I'd recomend it at all, but it's a better alternative than 1♦ on that motheaten 4-bagger.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#5 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-September-06, 12:36

jdonn, on Sep 6 2007, 01:10 PM, said:

Are you the 1♦ overcaller? This was a fairly easy pass over 1♣, then after they bid and raised spades you could double for takeout to show your hand.

Bah. Balanced schmalanced, I bid 1NT.

A 10 or two would make that decision a lot more popular, though.
0

#6 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-September-06, 12:43

jtfanclub, on Sep 6 2007, 01:36 PM, said:

jdonn, on Sep 6 2007, 01:10 PM, said:

Are you the 1♦ overcaller? This was a fairly easy pass over 1♣, then after they bid and raised spades you could double for takeout to show your hand.

Bah. Balanced schmalanced, I bid 1NT.

A 10 or two would make that decision a lot more popular, though.

Not only balanced shmalanced. Not good enough shmot good enough. Calling this a below average 15 is generous if anything.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#7 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2007-September-06, 12:46

1NT for me. Much more to gain than to lose, IMO.

If partner dumps me in spades, I'm OK with that.

I'm not afraid of a white-on-red double, and I'm not expecting partner to blast some white flier game.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#8 User is online   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,286
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2007-September-06, 12:50

Yes sorry, Im south and bid 1♦
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
0

#9 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-September-06, 12:57

jdonn, on Sep 6 2007, 01:43 PM, said:

Calling this a below average 15 is generous if anything.

Interesting. Most people think I undervalue aces.

I like overcalling 1 of a minor with 1NT. Really, really, really like it. We have all sorts of complex bids to find a good contract or a good game over it, while it ruins gentle bidding by the opponents. However, that may just be the level I play at. Maybe once I get to the upper strata the opponents will have no trouble stopping at 2 spades when it's right.
0

#10 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2007-September-06, 14:26

This has a clear 15 HCP's. Doing the 3.33-thing, you get to an adjustment up of +1 and almost +2, for 16-17 actual trick-taking ability. Against that is the obvious devaluation of the stiff Ace, but that stiff might be an asset in any of three lausible suit contracts.

What about strategy?

Worst case, you declare spades. I can live with that. Alternatively, you may preempt spade contracts for the opponents, you may be able to better find a heart or diamond contract that is VERY good, and a 1NT overcall is hands-down the best way to find what may be a lucrative club contract.

And, you are white-on-red. This is great stuff.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#11 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-September-06, 15:17

I prefer pass but 1♦ is not terrible I think. The hand is too weak for 1NT.

After 2♠ you must double. Bidding a bad 4-card twice is worse than bidding is once.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#12 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,414
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-September-06, 15:20

Prefer 1H overcall, yes not a great suit, rather than pass and have to back in later, possibly at the 3 level.

Also I do have some shape, 15 hcp and I am at fav vul for my overcall so partner should not expect a full opening hand here.
0

#13 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-September-06, 15:42

helene_t, on Sep 6 2007, 04:17 PM, said:

I prefer pass but 1♦ is not terrible I think. The hand is too weak for 1NT.

After 2♠ you must double. Bidding a bad 4-card twice is worse than bidding is once.

Gross.

This hand started as being too weak for a paltry 1NT overcall, and now you're going to make a game try across a simple raise?

Or maybe the X there is weaker than I'm used to. How would you have bid this with a 1-4-5-3 18 count?
0

#14 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,029
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2007-September-06, 15:48

The reason this is a below average 15 count (which it is in my view) has nothing to do with the number of Aces.

It is below average because:

1. The honours do not combine: Queens should be promoted when combined with other honours, demoted when not.

2. The stiff A of spades is grossly over-valued due to its being singleton...consider Qxxx opposite Ax and Qxxx opposite stiff Ace, and you, on play need two tricks from the suit... how do you rate your chances.... any difference observable to you?

3. The stiff spade, even tho it is the Ace, will mislead partner, often fatally, in terms of competing in spades

4. 4441 hands are (deservedly) notorious for playing beneath their apparent weight.

I notice that almost all intermediate players, and many advanced players, seem to feel that they HAVE to overcall (or double) whenever they hold an opening hand. This is a terrible way to play the game. The Pass card is the most under-utilized bidding card in the game, by a mile.

I suspect that part of this is due to the quality of opposition they encounter... playing weak opponents allows one to get away with awful bidding, and engenders a false sense of understanding the game. Start bidding 1N on these hands against real opps, and you may do ok on some hands, but you are going to get destroyed on others (not to mention the destruction you wreak on partner when he sees your hand in some spade contract)
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#15 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-September-06, 15:51

mikeh, on Sep 6 2007, 04:48 PM, said:

It is below average because:

1. The honours do not combine: Queens should be promoted when combined with other honours, demoted when not.

2. The stiff A of spades is grossly over-valued due to its being singleton...consider Qxxx opposite Ax and Qxxx opposite stiff Ace, and you, on play need two tricks from the suit... how do you rate your chances.... any difference observable to you?

3. The stiff spade, even tho it is the Ace, will mislead partner, often fatally, in terms of competing in spades

4. 4441 hands are (deservedly) notorious for playing beneath their apparent weight.

5. Awful spot cards.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#16 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,414
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-September-06, 15:53

considering we would overcall at fav vul on a decent 4 card H suit and very little outside, I felt my hcp compensates for the lack of heart spots.

In other words some people overcall on 7 or 8 hcp and only 4 hearts here.

though I do love to hear people are not against using the pass card even with 14 hcp. :) :)
0

#17 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-September-06, 16:11

It's a good idea to bid on odr (offense-defense ratio), not hcp (x AKJT xxx xxxxx is a much more offensive hand than this one). Make the hand a little better and it's an OK 1NT overcall, but like this pass is perfectly normal.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#18 User is offline   pbleighton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,153
  • Joined: 2003-February-28

Posted 2007-September-06, 16:43

1H in the partnership which permits it, 1NT otherwise, though passing is close in that case.

Peter
0

#19 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-September-06, 16:43

Why am I still debating this? I mean, I admit that it's marginal, and I might not do it against stronger opponents.

Quote

1. The honours do not combine: Queens should be promoted when combined with other honours, demoted when not.


Well, sure. But they didn't open a diamond, they opened a club. I have AJxx sitting over opener. That's a nice combo to have, especially since if I take the contract at 1NT that's the most likely lead.

Quote

2. The stiff A of spades is grossly over-valued due to its being singleton...consider Qxxx opposite Ax and Qxxx opposite stiff Ace, and you, on play need two tricks from the suit... how do you rate your chances.... any difference observable to you?


Sure, in one case they have 7 cards that'll end up being discards when I don't play spades, and in the other they have 8. If I have A across Qxxx, that's only 5 of our cards. I have 3 other suits to develop. I don't know what the odds are for actually needing to play the spades myself, but it seems slim. If they're going to end up trying to develop spades, I don't see a big difference here.

Quote

3. The stiff spade, even tho it is the Ace, will mislead partner, often fatally, in terms of competing in spades


Eh. Sometimes xx is better, sometimes A singleton is better. I think it's actually more likely to mislead partner in terms of competing in hearts.

Quote

4. 4441 hands are (deservedly) notorious for playing beneath their apparent weight.


True, but I'm not adding points for distribution, either via Goren or LTC. I don't think this hand is better than the same hand with a small spade instead of a small diamond. I just don't think it's worse.

For #5, the missing spot cards? Can't argue with that one. Or #6, it's IMPs- it's a much better bid in MPs.

Quote

I notice that almost all intermediate players, and many advanced players, seem to feel that they HAVE to overcall (or double) whenever they hold an opening hand.


True. You plan to sit this one out? 1♣-P-1NT-P-P-? 1♣-P-1♠-P-2♠-?

If I had a point less, if I had fewer controls and more quacks, sure, I'd pass both of those.

But if I'm coming in, I want to come in NOW.

1. My methods are much stronger (especially for finding game) when we overcall 1NT than when we do some second round 'do something partner' X. Game is very possible here, but I'm not going to find if I wait until I'm Xing 2♠.

2. 1NT over 1♣ has a much stronger pre-emptive effect than waiting. They may miss game or a fit as a result. We're removing almost a full level of bidding here, and opener has shown very little about his hand. It's not like bidding 1NT over 1♥.

3. It's very possible that I can shut the opponents out at the 1NT or 2 level if I call now, while if I wait we're almost certain to be competing to the three level.

4. Defense. Wow, do I have defense. God help me if my partner sacrifices over an unmakable bid because he couldn't imagine that I had 3 defensive tricks.

5. If partner does have 5+ spades, he's probably going to say them anyways. Suppose the auction goes, say....

1♣-P-1♦-1♠-2♦.

Maybe you have a great bid to show your hand now. I sure don't. How do you tell partner that you want to be in 3NT if he has a full 10 hcp overcall, but even 2♠ is too high if he was just putting in a free lead director across a passed hand?

I dunno. This isn't something I feel strongly about.

Quote

(not to mention the destruction you wreak on partner when he sees your hand in some spade contract)


Oh, if you wouldn't bid 1NT with the same hand with the QJTx of diamonds instead of Qxxx, well, then it's moot. You don't overcall 1NT with 4441 and a singleton ace, then you don't, and that's final. Making a bid like this isn't worth violating partnership harmony.

But if you do overcall 1NT with a singleton honor, and I think most people do, then this isn't a question of partnership trust. I don't think your partner's going to go nuts because it might be a hair too weak, especially in a spade contract.
0

#20 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-September-06, 17:04

Agree that this hand is not good enough to overcall 1N even if we don't mind doing it with a stiff spade (I do, some hands I would anyways but not with a hand that's also not good enough to bid 1N).
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users