I think that pass is clear.
But I would like to add some comments.
1) What does 3NT mean over 3♣? Keep in mind that 3♣ showed values.
2) What does 4♦ mean over 3♣? Does it matter if 3♣ shows values or is preemptive?
3) If either of these calls shows the red suits or, in the case of 4♦, diamonds and a major, then what is the distinction between an immediate 2-suited bid and bidding the suits naturally?
What does partner have?
#22
Posted 2007-September-07, 09:59
Yeah Justin and Josh make good points, no doubt. On this hand partner held:
♠Qx
♥Axxxx
♦AKxxxx
We made 4♥+2 but I wasn't upset about missing the slam at all. A few other pairs were +480, I was just wondering if anyone would try anything in my position. Frankly I was a little confused about the opponents' bidding so I wasn't about to try to be a hero.
By the way, Justin, I was talking to Han and he agrees that 4♣ here should be any two suits. I'm sure you're aware he would agree to that I just thought I'd mention it.
♠Qx
♥Axxxx
♦AKxxxx
We made 4♥+2 but I wasn't upset about missing the slam at all. A few other pairs were +480, I was just wondering if anyone would try anything in my position. Frankly I was a little confused about the opponents' bidding so I wasn't about to try to be a hero.
By the way, Justin, I was talking to Han and he agrees that 4♣ here should be any two suits. I'm sure you're aware he would agree to that I just thought I'd mention it.
Kevin Fay
#23
Posted 2007-September-07, 10:14
hrothgar, on Sep 6 2007, 01:12 PM, said:
Give partner as little as
♠ xx
♥ AKxxx
♦ AKxxxx
♣
♠ xx
♥ AKxxx
♦ AKxxxx
♣
Wow.
Any stock market predictions for us non-psychics?

Help
