Hi,
we play a system similar to 2/1, but with only
very few gadgets.
The partnership plays fairly sound opening bids
in all seats.
Today the following seq. came up:
1D - (pass) - 1H - (2C)
X (1) - (pass) - 2S (2) - ...
(1) SuppX
(2) ???
Does your interpreation of the 2S bid changes,
if partner is a passed hand?
Thanks for your input.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Page 1 of 1
Follow up after SuppX
#2
Posted 2007-September-04, 16:07
P_Marlowe, on Sep 4 2007, 04:12 PM, said:
Does your interpreation of the 2S bid changes,
if partner is a passed hand?
if partner is a passed hand?
Natural and forcing.
If partner was a passed hand, natural and not forcing.
Opener has done nothing to deny 4 spades. Responder has done nothing to deny 4 spades. Why shouldn't responder look for a 4-4 spade fit if he has the points?
#3
Posted 2007-September-04, 18:23
jtfanclub, on Sep 4 2007, 05:07 PM, said:
P_Marlowe, on Sep 4 2007, 04:12 PM, said:
Does your interpreation of the 2S bid changes,
if partner is a passed hand?
if partner is a passed hand?
Natural and forcing.
If partner was a passed hand, natural and not forcing.
Opener has done nothing to deny 4 spades. Responder has done nothing to deny 4 spades. Why shouldn't responder look for a 4-4 spade fit if he has the points?
We agree, although I certainly cannot claim to be an expert on sup X sequences.
.. neilkaz ..
#4
Posted 2007-September-05, 05:09
Yes, this is forcing. With a weak hand, responder must bid 2♦ or 2♥, so we may miss the ♠ fit if opener is not strong enough to bid again.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
Page 1 of 1

Help
