Formula 1
#1
Posted 2007-October-13, 04:34
I would like to know what the other countries who get info from not biased press think about it (It is said that Biased countries towards this matter are UK, Germany and Spain, what interests might have Mercedes for Hamilton are unknown to me, but I heard them as well).
All in all I just expect them to crash each other so Raikonnen gets what he deserves, and hopefully next year Williams come back to top.
#2
Posted 2007-October-13, 07:55
I don't really follow F1 very closely but I do read some stuff about it in the papers...seems to me that this year is full of funny happenings.
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#3
Posted 2007-October-13, 09:50
Every driver has his own engineering/service team and a big part of their income depends on the drivers success.
So when Alonso complained that he's not the no. 1 driver and his team does not make a good job, I wondered why he decided to join a team with a history of not having a no. 1 driver and why his team would be willing to reduce their own income to make him less successful.
A world champion who can't win against the newcomer and who is putting the blame on his team loses a lot of respect.
He was punished for the qualifying incident, another thing not to be proud of.
In the Ferrari-McLaren spy affair he acted as a witness against his team, I don't know enough about the background to judge about that.
#4
Posted 2007-October-13, 10:24
#6
Posted 2007-October-14, 14:26
hotShot, on Oct 13 2007, 03:50 PM, said:
Lol, you'd love the spanish press version of this one: Hamilton refused to follow the team's orders to let Alonso go ahead for qualify, and then the team ordered Alonso to stop at the pit lane.
All the blam to Hamilton as you can see
#7
Posted 2007-October-14, 16:02
- hrothgar
#8
Posted 2007-October-15, 10:59
Fluffy, on Oct 14 2007, 09:26 PM, said:
hotShot, on Oct 13 2007, 03:50 PM, said:
Lol, you'd love the spanish press version of this one: Hamilton refused to follow the team's orders to let Alonso go ahead for qualify, and then the team ordered Alonso to stop at the pit lane.
All the blam to Hamilton as you can see
Lol. Nice.
In the UK Alonso has come across as a bad loser, perhaps understandable given the circumstances. Hamilton's claim that people were out to get him (made when it appeared likely he'd be penalised for erratic driving behind the safety car) came across pretty badly too.
#9
Posted 2007-October-16, 04:16
Hannie, on Oct 15 2007, 12:02 AM, said:
since when does one need to know anything about a topic to join in the discussion?
George Carlin
#10
Posted 2007-October-16, 04:27
Hannie, on Oct 15 2007, 12:02 AM, said:
I think it's about the first formular in some applied math paper, not sure which one. Probably something about either evolutionary biology or analytical mechanics (since Hamilton was mentioned).
#11
Posted 2007-October-16, 04:59
helene_t, on Oct 16 2007, 12:27 PM, said:
Hannie, on Oct 15 2007, 12:02 AM, said:
I think it's about the first formular in some applied math paper, not sure which one. Probably something about either evolutionary biology or analytical mechanics (since Hamilton was mentioned).
You are right about evolutionary biology, with emphasis on evolutionary algorithms and the fitness function.
Although Hamilton likes to operate in the Hilbert space, this is more about iterating topological loops.
#12
Posted 2007-October-16, 13:40
#13
Posted 2007-October-16, 14:32
cherdano, on Oct 13 2007, 04:24 PM, said:
This is more or less what Fisichella said yesterday on an interview, looks like the correct answer to me. Thanks.
#14
Posted 2007-October-16, 15:59
Most people who aren't Alonso fans are glad he isn't winning and hope he ends up at a really bad team
Sean
#15
Posted 2007-October-18, 15:53
"gwnn" said:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.