BBO Discussion Forums: lead directing problem - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

lead directing problem

#1 User is offline   jim420 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 95
  • Joined: 2007-January-03

Posted 2007-August-29, 04:47

playing with a pickup p (me actually), u hold a 1 hcp hand ;) (looks like a game forcing hand doesn't it)

and had the following auction

Scoring: IMP

W N E S
- - P 1♣
P 1♠ P 2♥
P 4NT P 5♦
X 6NT P P
X XX P P
P

6NTxxN
lead ?


What do u lead? Am I creating any confusion here?
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-August-29, 04:56

just lead a high-ish diamond, probably the 7.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   jikl 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 558
  • Joined: 2004-October-08
  • Location:Victoria, Australia

Posted 2007-August-29, 05:00

Partner has told you to lead ♦s, lead it or forever deal with it in the future. Partner has made a decision, you can't see their hand, so do it. (As an aside I wouldn't be surprised if you need to lead a ♠ to beat it)

Sean
0

#4 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,228
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-August-29, 05:14

Hi,

a Diamond.

Ok, it maybe that the double of 5D was based on shortage,
a void, an the double of 6NT cancels this message, requesting
another lead.
Personnaly I think the 2nd double is based on AK in a suit,
assuming my partner is sane (?!), and the XX is just garbage,
but it may well be the other way round.

If I hit shortage, I wont kill any tricks our side has, which may
be good as well.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#5 User is offline   Quantumcat 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 944
  • Joined: 2007-April-11
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Bathurst, Australia
  • Interests:Archery, classical guitar, piano, watercolour painting, programming, french

Posted 2007-August-29, 05:53

Wouldn't double then passing the NT slam be for shortage, and doubling again be for AK?
I ♦ Transfers
0

#6 User is offline   jim420 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 95
  • Joined: 2007-January-03

Posted 2007-August-29, 07:56

P_Marlowe, on Aug 29 2007, 07:14 PM, said:

Hi,

a Diamond.

Ok, it maybe that the double of 5D was based on shortage,
a void, an the double of 6NT cancels this message, requesting
another lead.
Personnaly I think the 2nd double is based on AK in a suit,
assuming my partner is sane (?!), and the XX is just garbage,
but it may well be the other way round.

If I hit shortage, I wont kill any tricks our side has, which may
be good as well.

With kind regards
Marlowe

Exactly as u guessed, West had ♦AKTxx. And u also gave the reason for me asking this. After this board I dunno whether the 2nd double would create confusion for partner, and wondered what's in standard methods the 2nd X would mean to most people.

In the end, partner did lead ♦2, and ♦QJx was not together in declarer's hand ;) As to why the bidding went like that, I can never know...

NB: Only a ♦ lead (any ♦ of course) can set the contract. If E lead anything else, u give them 6N, as actually happened in one table where the auction went p-1♣-p-6NT-p-p-p, and the only other honour between the two hands was an onside ♣Q
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users