Posted 2007-August-15, 16:11
1N: ok. Nothing else is as good, so even tho 1N is imperfect, it is best
2♠: not my style. My style is pass. This is one of those hands where you want to bid, especially at this vulnerability, but partner will never understand what you hold. If I was going to bid, it would be 3♠. 4 is too much, even at this heat, and 2 is just silly... it promises partner values you don't have (so that he may double a cold contract) and doesn't promise the extreme shape you have (and the promise of values and the concealment of extreme shape may mean he fails to bid a good save)
Edit: of course, I understand that our weakness means the opps have values for game or slam, and so it may seem that it behooves us to act. However, our extreme shape suggests that there is at least some chance that this is a hand on which a high-level contract will be wrecked by shape. Going 800 when your teammates are -100 in a high percentage contract is not a good result. I won't argue that this is probably or even likely, but when added to the earlier points about involving partner, it strengthens the case for passing.
4♥: a beginner's mistake... presumably he doesn't know that 3♥ is forcing. And if 3♥ isn't forcing, or isn't known to be forcing, 6♥ is infinitely superior.
4♠: silly, silly, silly. This is known as giving the opps a fielder's choice... a baseball term in which the opposition has the choice of two winning plays. The opps have stopped in 4♥. They are stuck there, whether that be good or bad. Now we bid 4♠, giving them a chance to double when that is best or to bid 5(or 6) ♥ when that is best. Sure, it will be rare that they would bid 4♥ and then, over 4♠, reach a good slam, but rare is not unheard-of. In the rr in the 2000 BB, it was the Australians, I think, who reached 4major and my teammate doubled, and the double got them to run to 6♦. 4♠ would have failed, but 6♦ was cold (we played 4♠ undoubled at our table).
Double: words fail me.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari