X....
#1
Posted 2007-August-16, 11:30
1♠-X
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2007-August-16, 11:36
Jlall, on Aug 16 2007, 09:32 AM, said:
Agree with this, but not based on a bunch of spade values, rather good club values.
#4
Posted 2007-August-16, 12:49
Echognome, on Aug 16 2007, 12:36 PM, said:
Jlall, on Aug 16 2007, 09:32 AM, said:
Agree with this, but not based on a bunch of spade values, rather good club values.
I use it for points but not heart length, which in reality almost always turns out to be club values...
I don't know that really qualifies as a penalty or not, but I expect partner to leave it in a goodly portion of the time.
#5
Posted 2007-August-16, 12:59
#6
Posted 2007-August-16, 13:24
jdonn, on Aug 16 2007, 08:59 PM, said:
Nah, with 5 spades and some values you would have overcalled 1♠. At least Justin and Arend would. Besides, p has promised 4 spades this time. So 3 spades are enough for this penalty double. OTOH I don't see why you necesarily need clubs for this double. A 3-3-4-3 would do.
#7
Posted 2007-August-16, 13:49
Jlall, on Aug 16 2007, 11:32 AM, said:
Do you mean 4 spades and some values, or showing a penalty pass of 1♣ ready to double everything in sight?
#9
Posted 2007-August-16, 14:37
jdonn, on Aug 16 2007, 10:59 AM, said:
I find this auction very different. For starters, partner has absolutely promised 4 spades on this auction, unlike over (1♣) - X. Second, what is the hand with a club stack supposed to do here? Bid 2♣ natural?
I think partner has shown he's got the majors, so my double should be based on club values. I don't see how I could be 3=3=4=3 for this auction and have a double. To me that hand shape is a 1NT or 2NT bid. I'm think more along the lines of a 2=3=3=5 hand.
#10
Posted 2007-August-17, 01:34
its to avoid psych and to find 4-4♠ fit despite the 4-1 break.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#11
Posted 2007-August-17, 02:25
Echognome, on Aug 16 2007, 03:37 PM, said:
jdonn, on Aug 16 2007, 10:59 AM, said:
I find this auction very different. For starters, partner has absolutely promised 4 spades on this auction, unlike over (1♣) - X. Second, what is the hand with a club stack supposed to do here? Bid 2♣ natural?
I don't see why that hand feels the need to bid at all, even with fair values. But I admit I had not really thought about this auction before. I can see the logic behind double not promising 4 spades and am tending to agree with it, mostly so you can nail the opponents and because with 4 you will always end up bidding 2♠ anyway, so why not do it right away.
I am glad this thread came up, it made me think more about a situation I hadn't considered enough before.
#12
Posted 2007-August-17, 02:39
Roland
#13
Posted 2007-August-17, 03:11

Help
