[TimG]

hrothgar, on Aug 6 2007, 03:58 PM, said:

TimG, on Aug 6 2007, 08:14 PM, said:

I've just found this in Duplicate Decisions (not always a reliable reference on Laws):

"a logical alternative is a call that would be seriously considered by at least a substantial minority of equivalent players, acting on the basis of all the information legitimately available"

Evidence that Sponsoring Organizations do determine, to some extent, the definition of a Logical Alternative.

Here's the thing:

Duplicate Decisions is not legally binding. Some of the advice given in DD is flat out wrong. The ACBL has admitted that parts of DD are not to be followed. What this has to say about the validity of any of the rest of DD is anyone's guess.

Thus my statement that DD is "not always a reliable reference on Laws". And, that the cite is "evidence" rather than proof.