Quantumcat, on Jul 22 2007, 07:45 AM, said:
Well this thread is really good, is making me have to think really hard!
♣♣That's great ! Keep on it !
Let me reset you for a moment .... remember the bidding and what was explained to you by the opponents when you inquired about it.... Declarer has no 4 card major and has stoppers in all the unbid suits.
So, when he plays a small
♣ from his hand at trick 2, your partner having led the
Queen -- look at the facts, partner led the Q not a small one at trick 2--, you know he has the Ace of
♣ remaining, right ? What else could he possibly have for a stopper? (Declarer is NOT playing his Ace at trick 2 and leaving everyone with
♣ ... he is holding up).
Yes of course he has it. You know that. And he is holding up until the 3rd
♣ trick.
So think about what he started with (and therefore what partner started with) in
♣:
Theory A: Partner started with
♣QJ and declarer started with
♣Axxx.
Theory B: Partner started with
♣QJx and declarer started with
♣Axx.
If A is true, then partner has just played his last
♣. Do you really want him to lead a
♥?
If B is true, then partner is going to lead yet another
♣, declarer is going to take his Ace, and then declarer will take the
♦ finesse. And if it loses, you're right back where you were with A. Partner is on lead again. Do you want him to lead a
♥?
So you're right on top of it, and what do you play when partner leads his
Queen at trick 2?