BBO Discussion Forums: comments please, I was overcaller - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

comments please, I was overcaller pick up 5 card major no agreements

#1 User is offline   sceptic 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,343
  • Joined: 2004-January-03

Posted 2007-July-20, 14:44


Scoring: IMP


West North East South

 -     Pass  1    1
 Pass  2    Pass  3
 3    4    Pass  Pass
 Pass  

0

#2 User is online   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2007-July-20, 14:49

!! find a new partner

edit: ignore this, I misread the auction :P
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
0

#3 User is offline   sceptic 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,343
  • Joined: 2004-January-03

Posted 2007-July-20, 14:51

hehe why I did not think he bid badly, it is my 3D I am curious about
0

#4 User is offline   ralph23 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 701
  • Joined: 2007-July-11

Posted 2007-July-20, 14:55



2 by North is ok for me. I am thinking both the Q and J will be useless so it's a bit agressive with a balanced hand with only 3, but I think it is OK.

3 is fine and your King of is well placed. I don't see a thing wrong with it.

4 is aggressive by North (again) with the "wasted" round suit values, but how can he be blamed after hearing 3 from South?
Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that other philosophers are all jackasses. He usually proves it, and I should add that he also usually proves that he is one himself. H.L. Mencken.
0

#5 User is offline   badderzboy 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 450
  • Joined: 2003-June-08

Posted 2007-July-20, 15:06

All about agreements but an unassuming cue bid asks how good the overcall was and the 3 bid shows a good overcall now ptr sees a double fit with a near max overcall and feels the temptation so would I.

Now the question is 2s or 3s and given all my kings sit pretty I don't mind 3s

Steve
0

#6 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-July-20, 15:08

Looks like the usual IMP overbidding to me.

I like 2 as North. A bit pushy, but it's IMPs.

I would not bid 3 as South. It's aceless, it's balanced, and it's an 11 count. Looks a queen or a singleton shy of forcing to game to me. I do play that 3 here is a GF.
0

#7 User is offline   ralph23 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 701
  • Joined: 2007-July-11

Posted 2007-July-20, 15:17

jtfanclub, on Jul 20 2007, 04:08 PM, said:

I do play that 3 here is a GF.

My p & I would play it as help-suit game try, so I still think 3 is fine. I do agree that South doesn't have enough to insist on game.
Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that other philosophers are all jackasses. He usually proves it, and I should add that he also usually proves that he is one himself. H.L. Mencken.
0

#8 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-July-20, 15:21

ralph23, on Jul 20 2007, 04:17 PM, said:

My p & I would play it as help-suit game try, so I still think 3 is fine. I do agree that South doesn't have enough to insist on game.

Hmmm...so what's BWS? Is this call a GF or HSGT?
0

#9 User is offline   sceptic 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,343
  • Joined: 2004-January-03

Posted 2007-July-20, 15:22

so is 3D GF or shape showing and inv or help suit GT? this is what I want to understand
0

#10 User is offline   ralph23 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 701
  • Joined: 2007-July-11

Posted 2007-July-20, 15:30

jtfanclub, on Jul 20 2007, 04:21 PM, said:

ralph23, on Jul 20 2007, 04:17 PM, said:

My p & I would play it as help-suit game try, so I still think 3 is fine. I do agree that South doesn't have enough to insist on game.

Hmmm...so what's BWS? Is this call a GF or HSGT?



The standard doesn't go that far ... it doesn't discuss overcaller's actions after advancer makes a cue bid raise. :)

http://www.bridgeworld.com/default.asp?d=b...bwsall.html#VIC

If 3 is GF, what would 4 be in your methods ?
Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that other philosophers are all jackasses. He usually proves it, and I should add that he also usually proves that he is one himself. H.L. Mencken.
0

#11 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2007-July-20, 15:53

I think 2 and 3 were both pushy.
0

#12 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-July-20, 15:57

ralph23, on Jul 20 2007, 04:30 PM, said:

If 3 is GF, what would 4 be in your methods ?

Bleah, define the bid, don't define the responses...that seems very BWSish.

4 would be Splinter with a self-supporting (original) suit. I don't play the cue bid promises support...it could also be a hand with full opening count with a suit of its own (since a new suit would be NF constructive, you need to cue to do forcing constructive). For that reason, I don't think I've ever had a hand that bid 4.
0

#13 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-20, 16:10

3 is an overbid.
Btw, I would assume 2H promises a fit here no matter what your agreements are, as advancer is a passed hanhd.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#14 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-July-20, 16:20

I disagree with those saying 2 was pushy. I think that was an obvious bid.
IMO 3 was an overbid, but not by much. I'd rebid 2.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#15 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-July-20, 16:22

cherdano, on Jul 20 2007, 05:10 PM, said:

3 is an overbid.
Btw, I would assume 2H promises a fit here no matter what your agreements are, as advancer is a passed hanhd.

Good point, missed that, sorry.
0

#16 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,862
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2007-July-20, 16:25

2 is fine: indeed, no other call makes any sense. Passed hands don't generally hold more than 11 hcp, and the Q is not always wasted: give partner AJ or A10x or K10x etc.

3 was an overbid opposite a passed hand. Aces... where are the Aces I will need for game?

So I would have bid 2....yes, it is a maximum for 2, but when we start upgrading ALL maximums, they are no longer maximums, they are minimums for the stronger bid.. and this is still just a maximum 2.

BTW, I fully understand that changing the K to the A might cause me to bid 3 and get the same terrible result... I try to post the thoughts I would have at the table, not the thoughts that get me to the right result in the forum :)
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#17 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-July-20, 16:31

mikeh, on Jul 20 2007, 05:25 PM, said:

BTW, I fully understand that changing the K to the A might cause me to bid 3 and get the same terrible result... I try to post the thoughts I would have at the table, not the thoughts that get me to the right result in the forum :)

Luckily the same shift in time that moves the heart ace to your hand moves the heart King to your LHO, so when he leads his partner's suit you actually make it.

So what's your opinion on the real question (IMHO)...3 in this auction, GF or HSGT? When you play it, and in Bridge World Standard?
0

#18 User is offline   zasanya 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 747
  • Joined: 2003-December-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thane,Mumbai,Maharashtra,India
  • Interests:Chess,Scrabble,Bridge

Posted 2007-July-20, 21:19

North has already shown 10-11 points with implied fit.On opponents bidding he should infer that Q is likely to be wasted.He has 3trumps anot 4 so he should bid 3 and not 4 despite the fit.
Aniruddha
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
0

#19 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,070
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-20, 23:45

sceptic, on Jul 20 2007, 03:44 PM, said:


Scoring: IMP


West North East South

 -     Pass  1    1
 Pass  2    Pass  3
 3    4    Pass  Pass
 Pass  

2h by passed hand is 100% limit raise by passed hand.
I rebid 2s, decline invite.
0

#20 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-July-21, 00:07

I hate 3D opp a passed hand, I'm shocked by how much sympathy it's getting. Maybe people forgot partner was a passed hand. It's just asking for too much to have a game here. Sure it's possible but you need a completely perfect fit and you're going to get to so many hopeless spots bidding like this (like the one reached).
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users