BBO Discussion Forums: Disturbing the Opponents' NT - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Disturbing the Opponents' NT Do you balance?

Poll: Your bid (23 member(s) have cast votes)

Your bid

  1. Pass (9 votes [39.13%])

    Percentage of vote: 39.13%

  2. Dbl (3 votes [13.04%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.04%

  3. 2 Spades (9 votes [39.13%])

    Percentage of vote: 39.13%

  4. Other (2 votes [8.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.70%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   jdeegan 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,427
  • Joined: 2005-August-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Economics
    Finance
    Bridge bidding theory
    Cooking
    Downhill skiing

Posted 2007-June-11, 21:15

Scoring: MP

1NT-P-P-??

;) :) MP's against moderate opposition. You are not playing any convention in the pass out seat over 1NT. Do you balance? If so, how?

Also, do you recommend playing a convention in the pass out seat on this auction? If so, what? Would it change your bid on this hand?
0

#2 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2007-June-11, 21:37

Although 1NT-P-P-? is forcing when white versus white, it is much less so red versus red. Add to that no conventional approach, and I'll defend with good defense and no clear direction, myself.

Give me the ability to bid 2 to show diamonds and either the majors or just spades, and I might take a stab here at declaring.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#3 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-June-11, 22:14

I'd usually pass, although I might double in certain circumstances.

White on white I would take my chances with a 2 bid.
0

#4 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-June-11, 22:34

Pass, it's red on red.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#5 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-June-12, 00:20

Pass at this vul. Bid (often with far less and the same shape) at other vuls.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#6 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-June-12, 00:50

2S.
0

#7 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-June-12, 02:08

2.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#8 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-June-12, 04:33

I would definitely bid. What, I don't know, but I would :)
0

#9 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2007-June-12, 05:06

I prefer some convention here, probably the same as in direct seat. Dbl showing + X (or rarely, any great hand). Without one i'd pass and talk with partner about it later.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#10 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,122
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-June-12, 05:16

Hi,

playing no convention at all, Pass.
If partner is strong you will have a fair chance of beating
the contract -2 being in the picture, i.e. you have a chance
of getting 200, without the risk.

To answer your 2nd question: Yes you should definitly play
a convention to increase the safety level, take your pick,
I like Lionel, which would mean I have to X to show spades
(Gerben also mentioned the convention), but you should be fine
with any convention.
Some conventions dont work to well in pass out, e.g. DONT
(if I recall it correctly), but playing one is better than natural.
The adv. of an convention is, that you cane enter with 1 and
2-suiters, having a fair chance to find a reasonable place.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#11 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-June-12, 05:33

Pass. What Ken said.

I think it's nice to play some kind of convention that allows us to show two-suiters. It's ok for me to play the same defense regardless of seat, scoring, vulnerability and NT range. I have no strong preference for any particular defense. Except that the conventions to use by a passed hand must emphazise two-suiters that don't fit in the preempt structure.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#12 User is offline   bid_em_up 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,351
  • Joined: 2006-March-21
  • Location:North Carolina

Posted 2007-June-12, 12:25

jdeegan, on Jun 11 2007, 10:15 PM, said:

MP's against moderate opposition. You are not playing any convention in the pass out seat over 1NT. Do you balance? If so, how?

Also, do you recommend playing a convention in the pass out seat on this auction? If so, what? Would it change your bid on this hand?

I'm somewhat surprised by the number of 2S bidders here, unless they are making that choice because this question is being asked in the beginner/intermediate forum. I would probably recommend that the beginner/intermediate player bid 2S (or pass) as well. But....

X has to be a far superior choice (to 2S), imo. This hand should play well in 2D, 2H, 2S or 1N doubled if partner manages to leave the double in. So double gives you four chances (or more, since you can take still make calls when partner bids 2) to find your best fit/contract, as opposed to one chance by bidding 2S and hoping partner doesn't put down some 1-5-4-3, 1-6-3-3, 2-5-3-3 and so on.

On this particular hand, it's close between pass and double for me. Double is usually going to win me over though.

Personally, I prefer NT interference systems (capp, dont, landy, take your pick) to be off in the balancing seat.
Is the word "pass" not in your vocabulary?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
0

#13 User is offline   jdeegan 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,427
  • Joined: 2005-August-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Economics
    Finance
    Bridge bidding theory
    Cooking
    Downhill skiing

Posted 2007-June-13, 09:17

:) :) :D The vote for Pass versus bid was 7 versus 10. I think this reflects the fact that this hand is, given the adverse vulnerability, on the cusp. In this particular case, balancing worked out well for us, only because the opponents were extremely 'moderate' in their defense and allowed our poor contract to make.
Scoring: MP

1NT-P-P-Dbl
P-2-P-2
P-P-P

Decent defense gets 3, 2, 1 and 1 for down two. Perfect defense can do even better.
0

#14 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2007-June-13, 10:55

What happens to 1NT?

North undoubtedly leads some club. This gives Declarer an immediate problem. He probably ducks, is my guess.

South now leads a small spade to dummy. Dummy leads hearts from the top, winning two of them. Now, a small diamond yields Queen-Ace, in hand.

A small spade to dummy is then won by South and returned.

Declarer cashes the heart and club Aces (two spades, one club, one diamond, three hearts, for seven tricks). He exits with the diamond Jack to South's King. South now takes two more spades, for three spades, one club, and another diamond for six tricks.

So, Declarer makes +90.

How South avoided even down one is beyond belief. (Oh, a diamond lead -- ugh!)
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users