BBO Discussion Forums: Serious Partnerships -- Methods - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Serious Partnerships -- Methods

Poll: You've been in a long-term partnership using which methods: (70 member(s) have cast votes)

You've been in a long-term partnership using which methods:

  1. A. Wide-ranging natural 1-lvl openings, 2/1 bids not necessarily GF (9 votes [12.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.86%

  2. B. Wide-ranging, natural 1-lvl openings, 2/1 bids GF (9 votes [12.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.86%

  3. C. Forcing club or diamond (including polish club) (6 votes [8.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.57%

  4. D. Have tried both A and B (8 votes [11.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.43%

  5. E. Have tried both A and C (6 votes [8.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.57%

  6. F. Have tried both B and C (6 votes [8.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.57%

  7. G. Have tried all of A,B,C (22 votes [31.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 31.43%

  8. H. Have never been in a long-term partnership (2 votes [2.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.86%

  9. I. ALL my established partnerships play something weirder than A,B,C (2 votes [2.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.86%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-June-12, 12:02

Apollo81, on Jun 12 2007, 11:37 AM, said:

...played #2 for about 2 years before I realized that a large percentage of the system wins were coming from the notrump range...

Actually most of the wins came from both partners having the same understandings about all the bids. That can be said of any method.
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users