BBO Discussion Forums: Conv. for reverses not worth GF 3-level jumpshift? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Conv. for reverses not worth GF 3-level jumpshift?

#1 User is offline   Chamaco 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,909
  • Joined: 2003-December-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rimini-Bologna (Italy)
  • Interests:Chess, Bridge, Jazz, European Cinema, Motorbiking, Tango dancing

Posted 2004-January-16, 09:08

Hi all,
an italian expert (RIOLO937 on BBO) is writing an article to be published in Italy on some differences between SAYC (+conventions), 2/1 and some advanced version of italian 5-card major.

He has asked me to inquire about the following problem:

say you hold and open 1H and p responds 1 spades

x-AKQxx -AKxx-xxx

1H:1S
?

3D would be game force showing more than 16 HCP, and you do not want to force game opposite a minimum.

2D would be non-forcing. If pard has an average 7-8 count in misfit he will pass.
Yet, it is easy to construct many 16-17 hcp hands that will be laydown 3NT even in misfit, but that do not justify a 3-level game force.

SO, HERE IS THE QUESTION:
IS THERE ANY CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT THAT ALLOWS TO DISCRIMINATE GAME FORCE REVERSE FROM MINIMUM REVERSES IN THIS CASE (e.g. 2NT Ingberman is not available) ?

Thanks all
"Bridge is like dance: technique's important but what really matters is not to step on partner's feet !"
0

#2 User is offline   Trpltrbl 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,230
  • Joined: 2003-December-17
  • Location:Ohio
  • Interests:Sailing, cooking, bonsaitrees.

Posted 2004-January-17, 20:18

Chamaco, on Jan 16 2004, 10:08 AM, said:

Hi all,
an italian expert (RIOLO937 on BBO) is writing an article to be published in Italy on some differences between SAYC (+conventions), 2/1 and some advanced version of italian 5-card major.

He has asked me to inquire about the following problem:

say you hold and open 1H and p responds 1 spades

x-AKQxx -AKxx-xxx

1H:1S
?

3D would be game force showing more than 16 HCP, and you do not want to force game opposite a minimum.

2D would be non-forcing. If pard has an average 7-8 count in misfit he will pass.
Yet, it is easy to construct many 16-17 hcp hands that will be laydown 3NT even in misfit, but that do not justify a 3-level game force.

SO, HERE IS THE QUESTION:
IS THERE ANY CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT THAT ALLOWS TO DISCRIMINATE GAME FORCE REVERSE FROM MINIMUM REVERSES IN THIS CASE (e.g. 2NT Ingberman is not available) ?

Thanks all

I am not familiar with any conventions that handle a problem like that. But playing 2/1 pd has to know that with bidding 2 Posted Image pd still can have up to unbalanced 17 count. About any relay will get you to 3 level anyhow, or you ar taking away natural bids. If you have a fit, just raise. Without fit and other 2 suits bid NT if you have about 9 count. Sometimes you just have to rely on bridge instinct, cause you can't have a convention for everything :P

Mike :D
“If there is dissatisfaction with the status quo, good. If there is ferment,
so much the better. If there is restlessness, I am pleased. Then let there
be ideas, and hard thought, and hard work.”
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users