BBO Discussion Forums: evil preempts 2 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

evil preempts 2

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-May-07, 13:01

Scoring: MP


p-(3)-...-(4)
...

How do you find 4 in a smooth and believable way?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-May-07, 13:08

3C-X-4C-4S.

Alternatively 3C-X-4C-X-4H-4S.
0

#3 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-May-07, 13:37

that is a good way, indeed ;)
0

#4 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-May-07, 14:57

I might pass 4, but contract might be better than 4 :)
0

#5 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2007-May-08, 04:11

Jlall, on May 7 2007, 08:08 PM, said:

Alternatively 3C-X-4C-X-4H-4S.

I prefer that way. Avoids playing in a silly contract when opener is 3-4-4-2.
0

#6 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,908
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-May-08, 05:51

Hi,

over 3C a takeout double by North
is clear, and I'd say 4S by South
over 4C as well.

With kind regards
Marlowe

PS: The 2nd suggestion is certainly better,
but I never though about it.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#7 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-May-08, 06:43

FrancesHinden, on May 8 2007, 05:11 AM, said:

Jlall, on May 7 2007, 08:08 PM, said:

Alternatively 3C-X-4C-X-4H-4S.

I prefer that way. Avoids playing in a silly contract when opener is 3-4-4-2.

yep, that's how I'd bid it but just threw in the first auction for simplicity in case some believed the 2nd auction to not be believable.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users