Page 1 of 1
King of the world! What's your first decree?
#1
Posted 2007-April-27, 12:05
All sources of energy are now free. Governments must use tax dollars to produce energy (wind, solar, hydro, gas, even oil and coal etc.) and provide for its unlimited distribution.
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
#2
Posted 2007-April-27, 12:12
Suction vs strong 1♣ is banned.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#3
Posted 2007-April-27, 13:31
make everyone colour blind and non prejudgmental and a special order for Ron (no being grumpy before 11 am in the morning) hahahaha
#4
Posted 2007-April-27, 13:39
Quote
make everyone colour blind and non prejudgmental and a special order for Ron (no being grumpy before 11 am in the morning) hahahaha
That's so vicious!
If Ron couldn't be grumpy, he'd DIE!
You murderer!
Peter
#7
Posted 2007-April-27, 15:18
First decree: Everyone in the world is elevated to equal status with the king.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Black Lives Matter. / "I need ammunition, not a ride." Zelensky
#8
Posted 2007-April-28, 02:15
1: The government should generally not aim at proxy targets, like solar energy. The goverment might aim at certain ultimate targets (like reduced CO2 emision). The link from ultimate to proxy targets is generally done better by market forces than by government.
2: The "The citizens should be kept stupid and happy"-doctrine should be abandoned. Don't teach young schoolchildren nonsense because the dpt. of eductation thinks that they are not mature enough to deal with the evil truth. Don't create illusionary justice and illusionary civil rights. Any departure from justice and civil rights should be transparent.
3: Somewhat contrary to (1): The government may support the development of state-of-the-art industry standards to easy the fasing out of anacronistic de facto standards, like the QWERTY keyboard layout. Of course the de facto acceptance of the new standards is largely to be determined by market forces.
4: To get rid of irrational and/or anti-constitutional discrimination, goverment offices should not have acces to information on the basis of which they might discriminate illegaly. For example, a judge should never be allowed to know the skin color of someone involved in a lawsuit (unless relevent, such as someone complaining about a bas advice on U.V. protective cosmetics) and should not know their sex (unless relevant, such as in sexual abuse cases where penetration has been claimed),
2: The "The citizens should be kept stupid and happy"-doctrine should be abandoned. Don't teach young schoolchildren nonsense because the dpt. of eductation thinks that they are not mature enough to deal with the evil truth. Don't create illusionary justice and illusionary civil rights. Any departure from justice and civil rights should be transparent.
3: Somewhat contrary to (1): The government may support the development of state-of-the-art industry standards to easy the fasing out of anacronistic de facto standards, like the QWERTY keyboard layout. Of course the de facto acceptance of the new standards is largely to be determined by market forces.
4: To get rid of irrational and/or anti-constitutional discrimination, goverment offices should not have acces to information on the basis of which they might discriminate illegaly. For example, a judge should never be allowed to know the skin color of someone involved in a lawsuit (unless relevent, such as someone complaining about a bas advice on U.V. protective cosmetics) and should not know their sex (unless relevant, such as in sexual abuse cases where penetration has been claimed),
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#9
Posted 2007-April-28, 02:20
helene_t, on Apr 28 2007, 03:15 AM, said:
1: The government should generally not aim at proxy targets, like solar energy. The goverment might aim at certain ultimate targets (like reduced CO2 emision). The link from ultimate to proxy targets is generally done better by market forces than by government.
2: The "The citizens should be kept stupid and happy"-doctrine should be abandoned. Don't teach young schoolchildren nonsense because the dpt. of eductation thinks that they are not mature enough to deal with the evil truth. Don't create illusionary justice and illusionary civil rights. Any departure from justice and civil rights should be transparent.
3: Somewhat contrary to (1): The government may support the development of state-of-the-art industry standards to easy the fasing out of anacronistic de facto standards, like the QWERTY keyboard layout. Of course the de facto acceptance of the new standards is largely to be determined by market forces.
4: To get rid of irrational and/or anti-constitutional discrimination, goverment offices should not have acces to information on the basis of which they might discriminate illegaly. For example, a judge should never be allowed to know the skin color of someone involved in a lawsuit (unless relevent, such as someone complaining about a bas advice on U.V. protective cosmetics) and should not know their sex (unless relevant, such as in sexual abuse cases where penetration has been claimed),
2: The "The citizens should be kept stupid and happy"-doctrine should be abandoned. Don't teach young schoolchildren nonsense because the dpt. of eductation thinks that they are not mature enough to deal with the evil truth. Don't create illusionary justice and illusionary civil rights. Any departure from justice and civil rights should be transparent.
3: Somewhat contrary to (1): The government may support the development of state-of-the-art industry standards to easy the fasing out of anacronistic de facto standards, like the QWERTY keyboard layout. Of course the de facto acceptance of the new standards is largely to be determined by market forces.
4: To get rid of irrational and/or anti-constitutional discrimination, goverment offices should not have acces to information on the basis of which they might discriminate illegaly. For example, a judge should never be allowed to know the skin color of someone involved in a lawsuit (unless relevent, such as someone complaining about a bas advice on U.V. protective cosmetics) and should not know their sex (unless relevant, such as in sexual abuse cases where penetration has been claimed),
Good grief..these kings are bad enough..I hope this in not a post on putting....females as a king.
#10
Posted 2007-April-28, 08:58
If by sheer dumb luck I was king, I wouldn't know what to do with myself.
"Champions aren't made in gyms, champions are made from something they have deep inside them - a desire, a dream, a vision. They have to have last-minute stamina, they have to be a little faster, they have to have the skill and the will. But the will must be stronger than the skill. " - M. Ali
#11
Posted 2007-April-28, 11:22
I hereby make Mondays illegal.
He's justified and he's ancient, and he drives an ice cream van.
#12
Posted 2007-April-29, 06:21
mike777, on Apr 28 2007, 03:20 AM, said:
Good grief..these kings are bad enough..I hope this in not a post on putting....females as a king.
We already have enough males as queens, Mike.....
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
Page 1 of 1