Kxx
x
A10xxxx
Q10x
You hold this collection.
Partner opens 1H, you bid 1NT (forcing)
Partner now reverses with 2S
What do you try now? Would the natural bid of 3D here be forcing?
Page 1 of 1
IS this forcing?
#3
Posted 2007-April-25, 17:41
pbleighton, on Apr 25 2007, 06:24 PM, said:
3D would be forcing, but I bid 3NT.
Peter
Peter
ditto
2nt is a catchall weak bid that is not game forcing and does not promise stoppers but partner's 2s reverse does promise one more bid from opener so 2nt cannot be passed, or should not be.
Make the queen of clubs the jack and I would rebid 2nt.
#4
Posted 2007-April-25, 18:33
Ok I'll crack.
http://squeezingthedummy.blogspot.com/2006...-transfers.html
3♣ then 3NT. What could be easier!
http://squeezingthedummy.blogspot.com/2006...-transfers.html
3♣ then 3NT. What could be easier!
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#5
Posted 2007-April-25, 18:48
jdonn, on Apr 25 2007, 07:33 PM, said:
Ok I'll crack.
http://squeezingthedummy.blogspot.com/2006...-transfers.html
3♣ then 3NT. What could be easier!
http://squeezingthedummy.blogspot.com/2006...-transfers.html
3♣ then 3NT. What could be easier!
I like the transfer idea: I have been playing transfers in all kinds of auctions... to the point that I didn't think there were any transfers I didn't play, other than transfer responses to our takeout doubles
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#6 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-April-25, 21:59
jdonn, on Apr 25 2007, 07:33 PM, said:
Ok I'll crack.
http://squeezingthedummy.blogspot.com/2006...-transfers.html
3♣ then 3NT. What could be easier!
http://squeezingthedummy.blogspot.com/2006...-transfers.html
3♣ then 3NT. What could be easier!
This is a good idea
#7
Posted 2007-April-25, 23:59
Hi,
2NT would still be Lebensohl / Ingberman,
what ever.
If you play that, 3D would be forcing,
without that agreement I would say 3D is still
forcing, ... but if opener passes, it should be ok.
With kind regards
Marlowe.
2NT would still be Lebensohl / Ingberman,
what ever.
If you play that, 3D would be forcing,
without that agreement I would say 3D is still
forcing, ... but if opener passes, it should be ok.
With kind regards
Marlowe.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted 2007-April-27, 13:58
Partner held:
AQ10x
KJ9xx
Kx
Ax
and decided to pass my 3D. We play Lebensohl in 1NT (bid) and 2Y X P situations, but hadn't discussed it. We have now
AQ10x
KJ9xx
Kx
Ax
and decided to pass my 3D. We play Lebensohl in 1NT (bid) and 2Y X P situations, but hadn't discussed it. We have now
Page 1 of 1

Help
