BBO Discussion Forums: Is this a good idea? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Is this a good idea? minor suit responses

#1 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2007-April-25, 02:08

I've been thinking about responses over opener's minor in a natural system (3+ cards, pretty solid openings). Here's what I had in mind:

1 - ?
1X = natural
1NT = 6-9(10)hcp, no other suitable bid
2 = 10+hcp, 4+
2 = 6-9hcp, 5+, 4+
2 = 10-11hcp, 5+, 4+
2 = mixed raise (typically 6-9hcp, 5+)
2NT = natural GF (12-15 or 19+)
3 = weak raise (typically 0-5hcp, 5+)
3X = splinters
3NT = 16-18hcp balanced

1 - ?
1M = natural
1NT = 6-9(10)hcp, no other suitable bid
2 = 10+hcp, 4+
2 = 10+hcp, 4+
2 = 6-9hcp, 5+, 4+
2 = 10-11hcp, 5+, 4+
2NT = natural GF (12-15 or 19+)
3 = mixed raise (typically 6-9hcp, 5+)
3 = weak raise (typically 0-5hcp, 5+)
3M = splinters
3NT = 16-18hcp balanced
4 = splinter

What do you think about this?

Some remarks before you give suggestions:
- I want to have these reversed flannery responses
- I want to be able to show weak and mixed raises
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#2 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2007-April-25, 03:25

Simple question: Do you need the 10 - 11 reverse F bid also? I would suggest:

1 - 2 = WJS in a major
1 - 2 = Rev. F

I like the " 2N natural GF" part.

How about

1 - 2 = Invite balanced or
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#3 User is offline   Jboling 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 58
  • Joined: 2005-October-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Finland

Posted 2007-April-25, 04:36

I play almost exactly like that, but I do not have invitational reverse Flannerys. Instead I have 1-2 and 1-3 as natural invitational, so that I can distinguish them from GF singelsuiters. Thus 1m-2 is always reverse Flannery and 1m-2 is always a mixed raise.
0

#4 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-April-25, 09:44

Free: This is very close to what my partner and I currently play.

I know in Fred's articles he proposed 2 bids for reverse flannery, but I think you can safely use just one. Its the 6-9 hand that gets you into trouble, not the 10-12 hand.

I think its more important to have the single raise GF. We use 2 as the mixed raise, and the jump shift in the other minor as limit and this works well.

We are experimenting the structure I suggested in the 2N thread a few days ago.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#5 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-April-25, 10:01

Gerben42, on Apr 25 2007, 04:25 AM, said:

Simple question: Do you need the 10 - 11 reverse F bid also? I would suggest:

1 - 2 = WJS in a major
1 - 2 = Rev. F

I like the " 2N natural GF" part.

How about

1 - 2 = Invite balanced or

I think the better version of what you are suggesting is

2 = rev flan
2 = balanced invite
2 = mixed raise in clubs

and just forget WJS in a major. This makes all the other 3 bids function much much better, especially the balanced invite, since pard can even decide if he wants to declare or not (and thus you can make the bid on non 'notrumpy' hands without distorting your hand.)

Alternatively doable is

2 = balanced invite or clubs
2 = WJS

Giving you the more effective WJS being made in the most preemptive fashion possible, it just requires more discussion and workaround on the 2 bid but it definitely can be done.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#6 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-April-25, 10:28

This is a pretty basic structure and very playable and solid. You might be able to improve on it slightly by adding some complexity ie:

1C-2D=mixed raise in clubs or a balanced invite
2H asks then
2S=unbalanced mixed raise
2N=balanced invite
3C=mixed raise with no singleton

Then 1C-2H and 1C-2S are your reverse flan bids.
0

#7 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-April-25, 10:31

Jlall, on Apr 25 2007, 08:28 AM, said:

Then 1C-2H and 1C-2S are your reverse flan bids.

Not a good idea to have the reverse flannery call pass 2, since that might be the last playable spot.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#8 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-April-25, 10:32

pclayton, on Apr 25 2007, 11:31 AM, said:

Jlall, on Apr 25 2007, 08:28 AM, said:

Then 1C-2H and 1C-2S are your reverse flan bids.

Not a good idea to have the reverse flannery call pass 2, since that might be the last playable spot.

When it shows 10-11 points it seems fine to me. He's doing this over 1D already.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users