Help
Whats is your bid now? I'll post the rest of the hand later.
take the plunge
#1
- hooked
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,912
- Joined: 2003-November-15
- Gender:Female
- Location:Vancouver, Canada
- Interests:Multi
Posted 2007-April-24, 19:17
Here's one of the fun hands from last night. I'm South.
Whats is your bid now? I'll post the rest of the hand later.
Whats is your bid now? I'll post the rest of the hand later.
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#2 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-April-24, 20:32
I guess in theory 4N should be blackwood and pass then 4N should be minors?
But I'm sure all of my partners would think I meant 4N as minors. I guess I would pass and pull a X to 5D.
But I'm sure all of my partners would think I meant 4N as minors. I guess I would pass and pull a X to 5D.
#3
- Group: Yellows
- Posts: 6,772
- Joined: 2003-July-22
- Gender:Male
- Location:New Zealand
- Interests:Juggling, Unicycling
Posted 2007-April-24, 23:40
Partner forced with 3♦ and I have four-card support I will raise his diamonds.
5♦
5♦
Wayne Burrows
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#4
- 5555
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,520
- Joined: 2003-September-04
- Gender:Male
Posted 2007-April-24, 23:49
Cascade, on Apr 24 2007, 11:40 PM, said:
Partner forced with 3♦ and I have four-card support I will raise his diamonds.
5♦
5♦
Of course we want to raise diamonds, but the problem is how much of a slam try to make. xxx xxx AQxxx Ax is enough to for an pretty good slam, and this is a (sub?)minimum for 3♦. I would pass and bid 5♦.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#5
- - - T98765432 AQT8
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 15,085
- Joined: 2005-June-23
- Gender:Male
- Location:Las Vegas, NV
Posted 2007-April-24, 23:50
I have a clear raise yet nothing extra. Just because slam might make is no reason to go nuts on a minimum, I am already showing good offense by raising to the 5 level.
Easy 5♦.
Easy 5♦.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,373
- Joined: 2003-March-15
- Location:Hamburg, Germany
- Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball
Posted 2007-April-25, 01:06
If pd will understand pass as forcing (it clearly is) I would pass and pull too.
If I am not sure about this, I would gamble6 Diamond, because he surely won´t understand 5 Diamond or 4 NT either.
If I am not sure about this, I would gamble6 Diamond, because he surely won´t understand 5 Diamond or 4 NT either.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2007-April-25, 03:30
Without agreements, 5♦ for me.
Playing "pass + pull dbl = slam try", I'd try that
Playing "pass + pull dbl = slam try", I'd try that
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-March-07
- Gender:Male
- Location:Laos
- Interests:Wagner and Bridge
Posted 2007-April-25, 03:34
5D. Don't have stars in my eyes. This is an ordinary hand.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,096
- Joined: 2005-March-18
- Gender:Male
Posted 2007-April-25, 05:58
Hi,
5D.
The only thing speaking against it,
is the scoring method.
You can of course force to slam, but
you have a min opener, although a
nice one for diamonds.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: Making a forcing pass seems better
than a direct raise, but I would bid 5D
in a heart beat, so ... awaiting the post
mortem.
5D.
The only thing speaking against it,
is the scoring method.
You can of course force to slam, but
you have a min opener, although a
nice one for diamonds.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: Making a forcing pass seems better
than a direct raise, but I would bid 5D
in a heart beat, so ... awaiting the post
mortem.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#10
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2007-April-25, 06:33
why do you need to show both minors when partner has shown his own one?, I would bid 4NT
I don't think a hand that makes grand opposite a minimum is an ordinary one.
I don't think a hand that makes grand opposite a minimum is an ordinary one.
#11
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 2003-December-12
Posted 2007-April-25, 06:38
if pass and then 5♦ is invite to slam, perfect.
If 4N is blackwood, good also. Bad for 6♦ is partner with A of ♠ + A of ♦ and 2 small clubs...but still will have 50% guess...not abad 6 for most of hands my partner have bid 3♦...(maybe my partner is more conservative than yours...)
If 4N is blackwood, good also. Bad for 6♦ is partner with A of ♠ + A of ♦ and 2 small clubs...but still will have 50% guess...not abad 6 for most of hands my partner have bid 3♦...(maybe my partner is more conservative than yours...)
Occam's razor: "When you hear hoof beats, think horses, not unicorns."
#12
- hooked
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,912
- Joined: 2003-November-15
- Gender:Female
- Location:Vancouver, Canada
- Interests:Multi
Posted 2007-April-25, 07:53
Here's the full hand, I bid 5♦, my partner was the one to take the plunge.
6♦*-2
Scoring: MP
(P) 1♣ (2♠) 3♦
(4♠) 5♦ (5♠) 6♦
(P) 1♣ (2♠) 3♦
(4♠) 5♦ (5♠) 6♦
6♦*-2
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#13
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 2003-December-12
Posted 2007-April-25, 08:47
why your partner just not use negative double after 2♠?
Occam's razor: "When you hear hoof beats, think horses, not unicorns."
#14
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,096
- Joined: 2005-March-18
- Gender:Male
Posted 2007-April-25, 09:32
drinbrasil, on Apr 25 2007, 09:47 AM, said:
why your partner just not use negative double after 2♠?
because he is to weak to make
a neg. X, ... he is also to weak to
bid 3D.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#15
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,096
- Joined: 2005-March-18
- Gender:Male
Posted 2007-April-25, 09:34
jillybean2, on Apr 25 2007, 08:53 AM, said:
Here's the full hand, I bid 5♦, my partner was the one to take the plunge.
6♦*-2
|
| (P) 1♣ (2♠) 3♦ (4♠) 5♦ (5♠) 6♦ |
6♦*-2
Hi,
Since I doubt, that your partner did bid 6D
with the intention of making:
Your partner should pass, he has a nearly
certain trump trick and partner opened,
i.e. he knows that your side does have a fair
chance to defeat the contract, he may even
double, to prevent partner from bidding 6D.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#16
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 2003-December-12
Posted 2007-April-25, 09:40
P_Marlowe, on Apr 25 2007, 03:32 PM, said:
drinbrasil, on Apr 25 2007, 09:47 AM, said:
why your partner just not use negative double after 2♠?
because he is to weak to make
a neg. X, ... he is also to weak to
bid 3D.
With kind regards
Marlowe
if he wants make any action with a 6-5 hand in unbid suits looks fair better X than 3♦...
Occam's razor: "When you hear hoof beats, think horses, not unicorns."
#17
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2007-April-25, 12:10
Your pard must be the so-called "bratislavensis madman"
#18
- hooked
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,912
- Joined: 2003-November-15
- Gender:Female
- Location:Vancouver, Canada
- Interests:Multi
Posted 2007-April-25, 12:50
What am I missing here?
V 4♠= 620 or +1 650
NV 6♦*-2 = 300
V 4♠= 620 or +1 650
NV 6♦*-2 = 300
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#19
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 2003-December-12
Posted 2007-April-25, 12:53
jillybean2, on Apr 25 2007, 01:53 PM, said:
Here's the full hand, I bid 5♦, my partner was the one to take the plunge.
6♦*-2
|
| (P) 1♣ (2♠) 3♦ (4♠) 5♦ (5♠) 6♦ |
6♦*-2
seems something wrong here, 2♠ with 4 cards?
but you missing 5♠ is -1 maybe?
Occam's razor: "When you hear hoof beats, think horses, not unicorns."
#20
- hooked
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,912
- Joined: 2003-November-15
- Gender:Female
- Location:Vancouver, Canada
- Interests:Multi
Posted 2007-April-25, 13:57
drinbrasil, on Apr 25 2007, 11:53 AM, said:
seems something wrong here, 2♠ with 4 cards?
but you missing 5♠ is -1 maybe?
but you missing 5♠ is -1 maybe?
This was the rookie/master game, rookies sitting S&W
Looks to me like 2 losers ♠ and a ♥ in 5♠ , maybe I'm wrong.
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
(P) 1♣ (2♠) 3♦
(4♠) ?