Help
Pd and I agreed 1M-2M to show 5+oM+5+♣, at most 6 loser hand.
What do you reckon the best structure would be after (1M)-2M-p-2NT?
Page 1 of 1
Specific Michaels? 2NT asking bid
#1
- Csaba the Hutt
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,027
- Joined: 2006-June-16
- Gender:Male
- Interests:bye
Posted 2007-May-07, 16:16
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,151
- Joined: 2003-June-11
- Location:Southern California
Posted 2007-May-07, 16:22
If you are playing tops and bottoms; 2N functions better as some sort of specific ask, or even natural.
"Phil" on BBO
#3
- Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,586
- Joined: 2005-September-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
- Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor
Posted 2007-May-07, 21:18
3♦ as agreeing the major and asking seems obvious. With a minimum, partner signs off. With better, partner cues or shows shape.
If 2NT is not natural (my choice would be natural -- use 3OM as club-focused asking bid), then it should logically agree clubs, with 3♣ a minimum and anything else extras, again cuebids, but expected to be notrump-centered while below and unless bypassing 3NT.
If 2NT is not natural (my choice would be natural -- use 3OM as club-focused asking bid), then it should logically agree clubs, with 3♣ a minimum and anything else extras, again cuebids, but expected to be notrump-centered while below and unless bypassing 3NT.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
Page 1 of 1