Page 1 of 1
responsive double?
#1
Posted 2007-April-13, 08:45
7654
KJ
JT854
A4
unfavorable, MPs
(2♥)-Dbl-(4♥)-???
Double would (obviously) be responsive.
KJ
JT854
A4
unfavorable, MPs
(2♥)-Dbl-(4♥)-???
Double would (obviously) be responsive.
#2
Posted 2007-April-13, 08:57
I would tend to double ... I have some defense against 4♥ and if partner chooses to pull the responsive double, I have reasonable support for 4♠ (if partner bids 5♣, I guess I will bid 5♦)
#3
Posted 2007-April-13, 09:02
Hi everyone
Double is not responsive.
Double shows values.
This hand passes in tempo.
If your partner has extra values, he is free to express them by making a second double.
Regards,
Robert
Double is not responsive.
Double shows values.
This hand passes in tempo.
If your partner has extra values, he is free to express them by making a second double.
Regards,
Robert
#4
Posted 2007-April-13, 09:05
4S
I play the responsive dbl of a major after partner has made a takeout dbl, tends to show both minors. This is especially true if the major is hearts.
I think advancer is too good to pass.
I play the responsive dbl of a major after partner has made a takeout dbl, tends to show both minors. This is especially true if the major is hearts.
I think advancer is too good to pass.
It costs nothing to be nice -- my better half
#5
Posted 2007-April-13, 09:44
Pass. Put my KJ of hearts somewhere else, and I'd do something. This hand I have a working 5 count
#6
Posted 2007-April-13, 09:53
I play responsive doubles through 3S, This double would be card showing, penalty oriented in my methods. Thus, I agree with Robert.
Were I playing that the double was responsive, I would pass as well.
4S is a decent call as well, it just smells like no one can make 4.
Peter
Were I playing that the double was responsive, I would pass as well.
4S is a decent call as well, it just smells like no one can make 4.
Peter
#9
Posted 2007-April-13, 10:48
Robert: I think the terms 'responsive' and 'card showing' in this context are synonymous. I play responsive doubles through the 7 level.
I'm not doubling with this rag, nor am I bidding 4♠. Half of my hand is in the near worthless KJ. If pard has a moose, I'll hear about it.
I'm not doubling with this rag, nor am I bidding 4♠. Half of my hand is in the near worthless KJ. If pard has a moose, I'll hear about it.
"Phil" on BBO
#10
Posted 2007-April-13, 13:31
I'm doubling, my experience is that at this vul the opponents simply won't have their bids. If partner has a very offensive hand he can pull and I will either pass his 4♠ bid or pull whatever else to 5♦.
I would bid 4♠ if I thought it was likely to push the opponents up, but that doesn't seem likely to me since my spades are so bad.
I would bid 4♠ if I thought it was likely to push the opponents up, but that doesn't seem likely to me since my spades are so bad.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#11
Posted 2007-April-13, 16:16
Difficult. I think I'll double (and pull 5♣ to 5♦) but it's quite possible that pass is the best call.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#12
Posted 2007-April-13, 23:56
Pass. I have a sterile distribution and cards in Hearts, which is precisely where I don't want them.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#13
Posted 2007-April-14, 03:16
Pass. This is a no-brainer IMO.
It's more interesting if partner balances - I doubt he will.
It's more interesting if partner balances - I doubt he will.
Kind regards,
Harald
Harald
Page 1 of 1

Help
