You open 1♦ and LHO overcalls 2♣. This is passed back to you. What's your plan?
Balance with this hand?
#1
Posted 2007-April-08, 02:16
You open 1♦ and LHO overcalls 2♣. This is passed back to you. What's your plan?
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#2
Posted 2007-April-08, 02:41
#3
Posted 2007-April-08, 03:12
#4
Posted 2007-April-08, 04:03
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#7
Posted 2007-April-08, 04:32
whereagles, on Apr 8 2007, 03:08 AM, said:
Shouldn't this show more like 16+ ?
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#8
Posted 2007-April-08, 05:27
If partner's got a penalty pass (unlikely), we won't be defending 2♣ anyway - RHO will remove to 2♥. If partner has a penalty double and opening strenght, he'll not gamble on me being able to reopen.
Harald
#9
Posted 2007-April-08, 07:47
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
#10
Posted 2007-April-08, 08:46
by agreement, I have to reopen,
which means pass is no option.
I will pass partners answer.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#11
Posted 2007-April-08, 08:48
skaeran, on Apr 8 2007, 06:27 AM, said:
If partner's got a penalty pass (unlikely), we won't be defending 2♣ anyway - RHO will remove to 2♥. If partner has a penalty double and opening strenght, he'll not gamble on me being able to reopen.
what has gambling to do with it?
If your partner expects you to reopen
in case you are short, and you dont do
it, you are gambling not partner.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#12
Posted 2007-April-08, 08:51
zasanya, on Apr 8 2007, 08:47 AM, said:
not always, but 2D has only one way to
win, i.e. diamonds is best for your side,
but you may have a penalty for your side,
a 5-2 fit in hearts and a 4-4 fit in spades,
... and partner can still bid 2D in case he
holds 3 cards.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#13
Posted 2007-April-08, 14:57
P_Marlowe, on Apr 8 2007, 09:46 AM, said:
by agreement, I have to reopen,
which means pass is no option.
I will pass partners answer.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Same here.
#14
Posted 2007-April-08, 15:02
temp3600, on Apr 8 2007, 03:57 PM, said:
P_Marlowe, on Apr 8 2007, 09:46 AM, said:
by agreement, I have to reopen,
which means pass is no option.
I will pass partners answer.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Same here.
ditto.
Ready to play in the 4-2 heart fit if no double by opp.
#15
Posted 2007-April-08, 15:37
#16
Posted 2007-April-08, 16:45
mike777, on Apr 9 2007, 04:02 AM, said:
temp3600, on Apr 8 2007, 03:57 PM, said:
P_Marlowe, on Apr 8 2007, 09:46 AM, said:
by agreement, I have to reopen,
which means pass is no option.
I will pass partners answer.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Same here.
ditto.
Ready to play in the 4-2 heart fit if no double by opp.
Roflmao
Do you pre alert this? I hope you do. You realise that you can go for a huge number here against opponents who want to trap.
#17
Posted 2007-April-09, 10:00
jillybean2, on Apr 8 2007, 10:32 AM, said:
whereagles, on Apr 8 2007, 03:08 AM, said:
Shouldn't this show more like 16+ ?
By the book, maybe yes. In practice I find that too unflexible. Dbl + 2♠ should show just about this hand, while a direct 2♠ would be more like those 16+.
If you can't live with dbl + 2♠ I suppose you have to pass or bid 2♦
#18
Posted 2007-April-09, 12:50

Help
