BBO Discussion Forums: New age method revisited - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

New age method revisited

#1 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2007-April-12, 08:10

To those who would like to play 1 - 2 showing both majors (5 4) and think: Hey, but what do I do with 6 - 9 HCP and 6+, the hand I used to bid 2 with, here's a solution:

1 - ?

* 2: 6 - 9, 6+/ (yep, Multi 2
* 2: 6 - 9, 5 4
* 2: Forcing raise
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#2 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-April-12, 13:37

I have a novel idea: with 6-9 HCP and 6+ in a major, respond 1M, then bid 2M if possible.
0

#3 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-April-12, 13:54

Yes, why not just respond at 1 level in your major? Your structure is probably playable but is very bad for the diamond raise, there is no room at all now.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#4 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-April-12, 14:05

And it also removes the WJS possibility
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#5 User is offline   AlexOgan 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 42
  • Joined: 2006-June-09

Posted 2007-April-12, 14:23

I think he probably meant the following:

After 1D,

- 1M = Normal, including 6-9 HCP with 6M
- 2D = Multi-WJS (0-5 with 6H or 6S)
- 2H = Reverse Flannery
- 2S = Diamond raise

Not saying this is good, but it's better than what he wrote..

Alex
0

#6 User is offline   david_c 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,178
  • Joined: 2004-November-14
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Mathematics;<br>20th century classical music;<br>Composing.

Posted 2007-April-12, 16:21

No, I think he meant what he wrote :)

And it seems fine to me, apart from the 2 bid maybe :)
0

#7 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,310
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2007-April-12, 16:25

Perhaps an interesting alternative structure to reverse flannery is to simply play weak (but constructive) jump shifts, and let a rebid of the original major be an artificial force in some auctions. So for example:

1 - 1; 2 - 2 would be NF
1 - 1; 2 - 2 would be an artificial forcing bid

The reasoning is that when responder holds something like 5-8 points with a 6+ card major it is very frequently the case that you want to play in that major at some level. One of the awkward things about reverse flannery is that sometimes neither major is really an acceptable place to play, and then opener needs to be able to distinguish the "I have a natural 3m jump rebid but am not game-forcing" hand from the "I am 1-2-7-3 with a garbage minimum" type hand, neither of which is happy to pass/correct for a major suit contract.

It also works okay to play 1-1;2-2 as "non-forcing but up to invitational" since opener raising to 3 on 4-card support is normally safe even opposite a minimum (especially as this sequence can promise either a 4-6 shape or extras, since a minimum 4-5 hand probably rebids 1NT over 1). The only hand where opener "really wants to pass" is something like a 1-3-6-3 pattern, and then typically the "misfitness" means you have trouble making a game even with 24-25 hcp.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users