BBO Discussion Forums: pick a partscore - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

pick a partscore MPs

#1 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-March-26, 12:34

♠10
♥109642
♦AKJ74
♣104

unfavorable, MPs

1♣-(1♠)-Dbl-(pass)
1NT-(pass)-???

2♦ would be NF, not new minor forcing.
0

#2 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-March-26, 12:50

2♦ looks normal to me. 5-5's want to play in a suit.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#3 User is offline   scoob 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 344
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:calgary, ab (canada)

Posted 2007-March-26, 12:55

edit: sorry, not reading fully before posting lol

3nt
0

#4 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,741
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2007-March-26, 12:55

I like a pass of 1NT. Partner has something in spades wasted opposite my singleton, and probably has something in clubs (the suit he opened). The ♠10 may help if the opponents lead spades. The diamonds here are very good and if partner has some diamond holding like xxx or Qx they are a great source of tricks.

It seems unlikely to me that we "belong" in hearts, since partner could've bid 2♥ with three hearts and weakish spades, and my heart suit is not strong enough to make a 5-2 desirable. There is also no guarantee that partner has a true balanced hand in this auction; I would bid 1NT with various 4-2-2-5 and even 4-1-3-5 patterns.

With more scattered values (say x KTxxx KQxxx xx) I would tend to bid 2♦, but with one suit that can run opposite small cards and another than lacks any high honor, I prefer the 1NT contract.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-March-26, 13:21

I know this is another thread and it's not the same deal as the last neg. x one, but

-does p promise a ♠ stop?
-can p rebid 2♥ on 3 cards?
-what did the original X show? reds or only 4+ hearts?

etc.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#6 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-March-26, 13:23

gwnn, on Mar 26 2007, 03:21 PM, said:

I know this is another thread and it's not the same deal as the last neg. x one, but

-does p promise a ♠ stop?
-can p rebid 2♥ on 3 cards?
-what did the original X show? reds or only 4+ hearts?

etc.

standard

(in case this is confusing, this means ....
♠ stop -- judgment
2♥ on 3 --- judgment
the X --- 4+ hearts, a normal negative double)
0

#7 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-March-26, 13:25

I'd bid 2H, I assume someone will bid 2S since they have 8 of them and some HCP and then I'll bid 3D
0

#8 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-March-26, 15:37

That's a good plan, though you can try and muddy the waters with 2♦. If opps bid 2♠ and pard passes, you can try 2NT and totally confuse pard :)
0

#9 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-March-26, 15:51

This is a repost from the Washington Bridge League

http://www.districts...07/Sol0701.aspx
0

#10 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-March-27, 08:57

I would have 2Ded, but I like 2H better now, at MPs.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#11 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-March-27, 13:28

IMO 1NT is probably the best partscore but a pass will leave us poorly placed if LHO bids 2♠. If we bid 2♥ now we can certainly bid 3♦ over 2♠, but 2♥ may be a very poor contract if partner has fewer than three. I am pretty sure that I would bid 2♦ at the table; we can still get the 5-5 picture across by bidding 2NT over an opponent's 2♠ bid. This will also never be a 5-1, and partner may take a preference with 3-2 in the red suits.
0

#12 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-March-27, 13:48

Apollo81, on Mar 27 2007, 02:28 PM, said:

and partner may take a preference with 3-2 in the red suits.

good luck :) 4-6 is much more likely so he will pass.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users