What to do, what to do...
#1
Posted 2007-March-25, 00:14
Partner opens 1♠, red on red. RHO overcalls 3♦. Your bid of 3♥ is passed to partner, who bids 4♥.
If you make a call other than pass or 4NT, what does this mean/show/ask?
-P.J. Painter.
#2 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-March-25, 00:43
#3
Posted 2007-March-25, 08:08
Jlall, on Mar 25 2007, 01:43 AM, said:
Good answer.
Partner actually held ♠xxxxx ♥Qxxx ♦AKx ♣Q.
This is a tad weak, but the partnership does allow for quite aggressive openings.
In practice, I did not pass and regret that decision. However, it occurred to me at the time that perhaps 4♠ is the best approach if I do move on.
4NT by me is doomed to a 5♥ (one or three) reply, an expected call that helps me not at all.
4♠ shows what might be a key card for partner and allows me to answer 5♣ to 4NT, a much better auction.
As it is, partner will bid 5♥, and hopefully I'll get a diamond lead and make just five.
-P.J. Painter.
#4
Posted 2007-March-25, 10:32
kenrexford, on Mar 25 2007, 01:14 AM, said:
Partner opens 1♠, red on red. RHO overcalls 3♦. Your bid of 3♥ is passed to partner, who bids 4♥.
If you make a call other than pass or 4NT, what does this mean/show/ask?
I have a blanket agreement that 5M asks for a control in their suit, which is annoying here as I quite want to bid it to ask partner to bid slam. If I bid 5♦ partner won't really know what to do. I could bid 5♣ but then when I hear 5♦ opposite I don't really know whether I want to be in slam. Might be a time to wheel out the Old Black and bid slam iff partner has the missing aces. I know that's not what it was designed for but it's a rough guide...
J
PS Just saw the hand. In my book, that isn't an opening bid
#5
Posted 2007-March-25, 11:43
I don't consider partner's hand an opening hand. I open fairly light and yesterday I did open a 10-count with that shape but it had good suits and nice spots (AKxxx Q10x J10xx x).
- hrothgar
#8
Posted 2007-March-25, 12:39
kenrexford, on Mar 25 2007, 02:08 PM, said:
What? Didn't you bid 6 and opps let it through by leading a diamond?
#9 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-March-25, 13:21
whereagles, on Mar 25 2007, 01:39 PM, said:
kenrexford, on Mar 25 2007, 02:08 PM, said:
What? Didn't you bid 6 and opps let it through by leading a diamond?
Still a lot of work to do even if that happened.
#10
Posted 2007-March-25, 13:52
#12
Posted 2007-March-26, 01:30
If I want to explore slam, I very much prefer 5 Club as a cuebid, denying anything useful in Spades.
With a funny pd who opens this sort of sh.., I surely pass 4 Heart. And if we write down 4 Heart + 3 because this time he holds AKxxxx,Qxx,Axx,x I tell him that his opening style preempts our slam bidding.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#13
Posted 2007-March-26, 06:17
whereagles, on Mar 25 2007, 01:39 PM, said:
kenrexford, on Mar 25 2007, 02:08 PM, said:
What? Didn't you bid 6 and opps let it through by leading a diamond?
We ended up in six, and a diamond lead came (the Jack!). However, hearts were strangely 3-1 with RHO having the third heart. Clubs were 6-1. I gave it a go, winning the diamond, playing two trumps (ending in dummy), cashed a second high diamond for the spade ditch. When diamonds turned out to be split 7-2, it seemed that I now needed RHO to hold specifically ♠K ♥xxx ♦Qxxxxxx ♣K9. When RHO played a small club under the Queen, I semi-safety ducked and got spade-spade for down one (no club ruff/trump promo for down two). This line also offered a chance of simply Kx to the right, because LHO had ditched a club on the second heart.
-P.J. Painter.

Help
