Zimbabwe
#1
Posted 2007-March-24, 10:33
Why is it that people take more interest and can be more outspoken over a person who cuts the head off a dog? This act was obviously brutal and repulsive but think these people in Zimbabwe are no more able to protect themselves than this dog.
Why is Mugabe allowed to continue his brutal regime?
http://thebeardedman....com/index.html
(still learning)
#2
Posted 2007-March-24, 11:00
#3
Posted 2007-March-24, 11:21
maybe there is no oil in Ethiopia also, that may just be a small coincidence
#4
Posted 2007-March-24, 11:36
1. Mugabe is a dreadful tyrant. I don't think that anything he did in the past can possible excuse his autocratic behaviour. His policies were questionable when he initially took power. They've been getting progressively worse over time. Over the past five years or so, they have gotten down right scary. Even so, Mugabe is still very popular with certain segements of the population in Africa.
2. The European colonial legacy in Rhodesia and South Africa has to been taken into account. Zimbabwe was a white dominated colony until the late 1970s. (For what its worth, I think that the country was administered much better during this time). However, the colonial history makes it extremely difficult for Europe and North America to intervene. It will look like a return to colonialism.
These two forces combine to really limit anyone's ability to intervene. In all seriousness.... What do you think should be done? I'm not sure what kind of policies would prove effective.
Compounding this, no one really gives a damn. (Certianly not to the point where anyone is willing to donate much money)
#5
Posted 2007-March-24, 12:30
sceptic, on Mar 24 2007, 12:21 PM, said:
maybe there is no oil in Ethiopia also, that may just be a small coincidence
Did I neglect to include "revenge" in strategic interest? Blackhawk down, anyone?
#6
Posted 2007-March-24, 12:58
#7
Posted 2007-March-24, 16:51
Sean
#8
Posted 2007-March-25, 00:33
How long can we stand by and watch Rwanda, Sudan, Zimbabwe…
(still learning)
#9
Posted 2007-March-25, 04:34
#10
Posted 2007-March-25, 04:43
Financial support to local humanitarian organizations not controled by Mugabe is generally better.
#11
Posted 2007-March-25, 07:49
#12
Posted 2007-March-25, 07:59
Within one or two years, Mugabe will have lost control over his own party and/or the military and/or the police. No idea what will happen then.