What would you bid now?
What is this double?
#2
Posted 2007-March-13, 04:38
3C was preemptive or limit?
Does not really matter, but it may give
you a feeling what partner is looking at.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#3
Posted 2007-March-13, 07:15
#4
Posted 2007-March-13, 07:22
Peter
#5
Posted 2007-March-13, 07:39
Same result as the other folks, though- 3♠. I just wanted to point out that if you changed your hand to:
♠QT96
♥T7
♦KQT82
♣A8
I would still bid 3♠, not 3♦.
#6
Posted 2007-March-13, 08:25
So the only question is whether to bid 3♠ or 4♠. I'd probably bid 4♠ - as whereagles says, game is possible if partner has a well-fitting maximum, and as far as I'm concerned partner must have a well-fitting maximum to justify bidding on this auction! But 3♠ is OK I suppose. No other calls make any sense.
#7
Posted 2007-March-13, 09:10
4♠
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#8
Posted 2007-March-13, 09:39
If pard has a perfecto minimum KJxx, Axxx, Jxxx, x, game is excellent.
Bids like 4♠ make life very tough on your opponents. Am I bidding it on: Axxxx, x, Qxxxx, xx? Or do I have a 13 count that can't come in over 1♣? If LHO guesses right, by passing or bidding 5♣, good for him. But if LHO guesses wrong, I come out with a big profit on a mundane hand.
#9
Posted 2007-March-13, 10:12
Keep in mind that pard isn't going to double 3♣ on some balanced hand that he couldn't open.
#10
Posted 2007-March-13, 14:17
Apollo81, on Mar 13 2007, 11:12 AM, said:
I'm not.
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#11
Posted 2007-March-13, 16:47
bid_em_up, on Mar 14 2007, 03:17 AM, said:
Apollo81, on Mar 13 2007, 11:12 AM, said:
I'm not.
3S is a stand out at MPs or BAM and 4S is a stand out at Imps.
#12
Posted 2007-March-13, 17:41
I am more inclined, at least in theory, to expect a hand not suitable for an opening because of rebid problems. 5440 is not so problematic. 3451/4351 is not problematic either, as you can live with a major response or could rebid diamonds. So, I am leaning toward a 4441 specifically, as 1NT by Responder would be ugly.
Now, even with 4441, I would open something if I held a very strong suit, and yet I seem to need quality suits all over to justify this level of involvement. Perforce, I suspect AJ9x in diamonds. Stiff club. I'm having trouble with the majors, but perhaps ♠Kxxx ♥QJ98 ♦AJ9x ♣x? That seems rich for a third-seat white pass, at IMP's, but I cannot imagine less for this three-level double. Opposite that, 4♠ has play.
So, with any normal person, I would also bid 4♠.
-P.J. Painter.
#13
Posted 2007-March-13, 20:17
pclayton, on Mar 13 2007, 10:39 AM, said:
I think exactly the opposite, partner tends to be light and just wants to make life difficult for the opponents. 3♠ for me.
Also it's an important point that the club ace would be much more valuable in any other suit, even if partner has a singleton club. In that case I would bid 4♠ and hope to make it purely on fit.
#14
Posted 2007-March-13, 21:24
bid_em_up, on Mar 13 2007, 10:10 AM, said:
4♠
ditto.

Help

W N E S
- - - P
P P 1♣ P
3♣ X P ?