BBO Discussion Forums: Would you have bid with 0 HCP? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Would you have bid with 0 HCP?

#1 User is offline   xx1943 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 492
  • Joined: 2004-March-11

Posted 2007-February-12, 02:47

Scoring: IMP

East  South West North
 1♥   pass    1NT    X
 2♦   pass    pass  2♠
pass pass    3♦    pass
pass  ??


Do you bid 3♠ or do you pass?

This was the full hand (rotated):
Scoring: IMP



We missed a cold game vulnerable. Your comments?
Who is to blame?

Al
♥♥♥ Play Bridge for fun and entertainment and to meet nice people. ♥♥♥
♠♥♠ BAD bidding may be succesful due to excellent play, but not vice versa. ♦♣♦
Teaching in the BIL TUE 8:00am CET.

Lessons available. For INFO look here: Play bridge with Al
0

#2 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-February-12, 03:18

My first thought was to bid 3♠, just follwoing the LOTT. Maybe it will encourage p to double 4♦, but then I can always bid 4♠.

But I don't think South would raise 3♠ anyway. Nobody to blame. Besides, you're above PAR, since opps can make 5♦.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#3 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2007-February-12, 03:36

I would raise to 3♠ right away after 2♠. Passing twice is well... passive.

I come to this conclusion using the box method. Having passed 2♦ you do not have a good hand. Yet you have 4-card support and a singleton, partner has shown 18+ with good ♠. You owe him a bid!
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#4 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2007-February-12, 03:47

If I trusted partner, I would have raised 2S to 3S immediately (not over 3D), and it's closer to a 4S bid than a pass.

Double- then-bid traditionally shows a very strong hand. Somewhat surprisingly, partner actually had a very strong hand and bid impeccably.
0

#5 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-February-12, 05:07

Agree with frances, including the comment about pard's nice bidding :)
0

#6 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2007-February-12, 05:13

I think I'd have bid 3♠ over 2♠. Not easy to find game though.
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

#7 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-February-12, 05:14

Partner showed a strong hand with ♠ and I have 4card support and shortage in opps suit.
I would bid 3♠, and i would have bid it over 2♠.
0

#8 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2007-February-12, 20:11

I would have raised to 3S over 2S: 4-support with single= likely 2 tricks added to his near 8 auction.
0

#9 User is offline   Goreny 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 2007-February-13

Posted 2007-February-13, 05:13

I do not know exactly - I sympathize with Albrecht's passes (without such a good side suit fits with so much ruffing values no chance for 4♠), but if I think that opponents can be in cold 3NT or minor game, may be I'd choose 4♠ reply over 3♦
0

#10 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-February-13, 11:39

I would have bid 4S directly over 2S.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#11 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,401
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-February-13, 22:38

I found this to be an excellent thread and wanted to say thank you for posting it.
Needless to say I thought this was a tougher one than the other posters. thanks.
I find it a bit exasperating that so many found it pretty easy, sigh. :)
0

#12 User is offline   BebopKid 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 230
  • Joined: 2007-January-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Little Rock, Arkansas, USA

Posted 2007-February-13, 23:01

I would have passed. Partner's double to me denied the length in spades.

I don't see partner having that holding with that bid.
♦♦♦♦♦♦

BebopKid (Bryan Lee Williams)

"I've practiced meditation most of my life. It's better than sitting around doing nothing."
(Tom Sims, from topfive.com)

♦♦♦♦♦♦
0

#13 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-February-14, 00:39

BebopKid, on Feb 13 2007, 11:01 PM, said:

I would have passed. Partner's double to me denied the length in spades.

I don't see partner having that holding with that bid.

Double of 1N is a takeout double of spades. That is either takeout shape, or a very strong hand. Bidding 2♠ later shows the very strong hand (not, this is not balancing, this was a planned auction).

Not raising with 4-card support and a singleton is criminal.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#14 User is offline   jikl 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 558
  • Joined: 2004-October-08
  • Location:Victoria, Australia

Posted 2007-February-14, 04:36

I would have bid 3♠ over 2♠ immediately, we may not have got to game, depends how aggressive partner is feeling.

Sean
0

#15 User is offline   mhais 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44
  • Joined: 2007-January-12

Posted 2007-February-14, 05:24

i will bid 4 s
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users