BBO Discussion Forums: limit raise or not? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

limit raise or not?

#1 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,401
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-February-11, 18:18

AJ92...932...K62....K42


Is this hand worth showing a 3 card limit raise in hearts, if so why?


T84....KQJT7...AQ7....T3

Is this hand worth accepting the 3 card limit raise, if so why?
0

#2 User is offline   Badmonster 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 272
  • Joined: 2005-May-17

Posted 2007-February-11, 18:22

Am I missing something? Aren't they both flat and minimum and... somewhat lacking in charm?
http://badmonsters.blogspot.com probably will not change your life.
0

#3 User is offline   pbleighton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,153
  • Joined: 2003-February-28

Posted 2007-February-11, 18:25

1. Yes, in spite of the shape, because of the prime cards.
2. Not unless you open very light. A balanced 12 count is a minimum which shouldn't accept for pairs who open normally. The trump suit is nice but doesn't make up the difference.

Peter
0

#4 User is offline   Miron 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 358
  • Joined: 2006-January-30
  • Location:Praha, Czech Republic

Posted 2007-February-11, 18:53

1) The hand is definitely worth limit raise (even if it would be slightly weaker)
2) No, the limit raise should be passed. Nothing worth interrest, except already told issues: 5 hearts and 12 HCP. If this would be enough for partner to bid game, he would bid it.
0

#5 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-February-11, 18:56

1 Yes.
2 Not for me.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#6 User is offline   Miron 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 358
  • Joined: 2006-January-30
  • Location:Praha, Czech Republic

Posted 2007-February-11, 18:57

You played 2♥ or 3♥ and the result was 170?
If so, it has 50% * 75% = 38% and even this is lucky (you are missing the ♥A instead of ♠A...)
0

#7 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-February-11, 18:57

mike777, on Feb 11 2007, 08:18 PM, said:

AJ92...932...K62....K42


Is this hand worth showing a 3 card limit raise in hearts, if so why?


T84....KQJT7...AQ7....T3

Is this hand worth accepting the 3 card limit raise, if so why?

1.Yes
2.No
0

#8 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,401
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-February-11, 21:01

ok why is this 9 ltc hand, 4333 shape with no heart honours a 3 card limit raise?
0

#9 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2007-February-11, 21:09

mike777, on Feb 11 2007, 07:01 PM, said:

ok why is this 9 ltc hand, 4333 shape with no heart honours a 3 card limit raise?

The 4 controls certainly help.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#10 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2007-February-11, 21:12

mike777, on Feb 11 2007, 10:01 PM, said:

ok why is this 9 ltc hand, 4333 shape with no heart honours a 3 card limit raise?

Although I would admittedly never follow my gut on this in practice, I agree with this thought completely. This looks like a high-end constructive raise.

That's probably wrong, but I also strongly dislike the flat pattern, K-enpty thirds, and lack of any trump honors.

This might even be a fair hand for a 1♠ call.

I cannot imagine accepting with the opened hand.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#11 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2007-February-11, 21:28

You have 11 HCP but 4333 distribution so deduct a point, but if that leaves you on the fance you have prime controls and the J is in your long suit and 9's are better than 2's so I'd give a 3 card limit raise.

I'd pass any limit raise with this decent 5332 12 HCP.

Game is against the odds here.

.. neilkaz ..
0

#12 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-February-11, 21:51

1. Yes. Its 4333, but its mostly prime.

2. I'd pass.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#13 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2007-February-11, 22:00

Yes
No
--Ben--

#14 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,219
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-February-12, 01:56

Hi,

unclear, but I will surely invite game,
the alternative to the limit raise, would
be to sell the hand as 10-12 bal.

Playing forcing NT, I would sell the hand
as 3 card limit raise, in case partner shows
a 6 card suit, else I would bid 2NT.

Partner has a minimum opener, there is no
reason to accept an invitation.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#15 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2007-February-12, 03:49

1. Yes, but only just. I wouldn't object to a constructive 2major (some systems don't allow a "7-10 3-card raise" in which case I would certainly show it as a limit raise).

2. Nowhere close.
0

#16 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2007-February-12, 05:15

Yes, easy limit raise.

No, easy pass... and worry that your not too high already.
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

#17 User is offline   SoTired 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,016
  • Joined: 2005-June-20
  • Location:Lovettsville, VA

Posted 2007-February-12, 06:21

1) yes, 11 hcp, 3-card support
2) No - If you accept with this one, just say you accept all invites. This hand is min opener, 5332, even the 2-10's are worthless because not connected. Good rule - with 12-13 hcp, don't accept unless you have a singleton
It costs nothing to be nice -- my better half
0

#18 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-February-12, 12:15

mike777, on Feb 11 2007, 07:18 PM, said:

AJ92...932...K62....K42


Is this hand worth showing a 3 card limit raise in hearts, if so why?


T84....KQJT7...AQ7....T3

Is this hand worth accepting the 3 card limit raise, if so why?

I'd bid 1♠...I'd much rather play in a 4-4 spade fit than a 5-3 heart fit when the 3 card hand has no ruffing value. Besides, the AJ9x needs some help, and partner can better evaluate his hand with that bid.

If I had a 4 card minor, I'd bid 3♥. It's not a question of strength, just where I'd rather play.

And if my partner accepted the limit raise...well, I wouldn't bother with limit raises any more. What would be the point?
0

#19 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-February-12, 13:59

mike777, on Feb 11 2007, 11:01 PM, said:

ok why is this 9 ltc hand, 4333 shape with no heart honours a 3 card limit raise?

LTC works best when there is a 9+ card trump fit and both sides have 4+ trumps.
LTC is much less accurate on other hands.

If you don't LR when you have 11 HCP, then opener will have to invite on all sorts of hands that he shouldn't bid on. For every making game you reach, you will go down in 3M/4M several times when you could have made 2M. If opener doesn't change his inviting style based on "partner routinely has 10-11 HCP for a single raise" then you will miss many good games.

IMO a Drury-like convention should also be used by UPHs to show this hand type.
0

#20 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2007-February-12, 20:20

Closer to 3NT than 4H. Limit BAL 3-support raise in your fit scheme? If 9 tricks are the limit I want to try for a game bonus.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users