void-KJx-KQ9xx-AKQ9x (2S)-??
#1
Posted 2007-February-05, 18:56
You hold: void-KJx-KQ9xx-AKQ9x
RHO opens 2♠ weak.
What do you bid with expert pickup partner without discussion?
What do you bid with your regular partner?
thanks,
Koen
#3
Posted 2007-February-05, 19:46
#4
Posted 2007-February-05, 20:21
#5
Posted 2007-February-05, 20:52
The_Hog, on Feb 5 2007, 09:21 PM, said:
1.Some experts do not like to double with a void in opponents suit.
2.Some partnerships guarantee 4 card ♥ after a double of 2♠
I will X with any partner.
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
#7
Posted 2007-February-05, 22:44
zasanya, on Feb 6 2007, 12:52 PM, said:
The_Hog, on Feb 5 2007, 09:21 PM, said:
1.Some experts do not like to double with a void in opponents suit.
2.Some partnerships guarantee 4 card ♥ after a double of 2♠
I will X with any partner.
Can you tell us who these "experts" are, please? Who doesn't X a 2S opening on say a 0454 18 count? I would like to ask these "experts" what they do on such a hand.
#8
Posted 2007-February-06, 01:29
2. I would have bid 3♠ showing either a strong hand with minors or a strong one suited hand in a minor, followed probably by 4♥
#9
Posted 2007-February-06, 01:37
Yes I see only 3 losers but still bid 3D.
#11
Posted 2007-February-06, 02:41
whereagles, on Feb 6 2007, 03:20 AM, said:
Hmm, if 4NT then we might have a tainted meat situation, please be alert. Just kidding of course.
I think double is clearly right. Hearts can easily be right if partner has 5. Rigid rules about what to promiss or deny by doubling is ridiculous.
However, 4NT is much-much better than 3♦. When it goes all pass after 3♦, I'd start throwing up even before the dummy comes down.
#12
Posted 2007-February-06, 03:00
1) I bid my longest suit
2) I am void in spades
3) I cannot lead a spade vs x contract
4) I have less than 4 hearts.
5) LTC ..hmm thought that only matters once a fit is found?
#13
Posted 2007-February-06, 03:22
I don't think this is the hand to lie about your holding. When we have one trump less than partner expects, when we can't lead ♠s right away like partner expects, I'd say that on hands that we knock 2♠ a decent amount, we may have missed a minor suit slam. Or we may end up in game in a 4-3 heart fit going off because of a nasty break.
Having said that, I'm no "expert" either. Obviously my opinions are inferior because they don't agree with the 'one true choice' that is double.
#14
Posted 2007-February-06, 03:49
3♠ with regular partner: minors, a bit worried about the 3-card ♥ which partner won't expect, but still with 6♥ he'll try 4♥...
#15
Posted 2007-February-06, 03:52
mike777, on Feb 6 2007, 07:00 PM, said:
1) I bid my longest suit
2) I am void in spades
3) I cannot lead a spade vs x contract
4) I have less than 4 hearts.
5) LTC ..hmm thought that only matters once a fit is found?
C are as long and are better quality, so why don't you bid 3C? You might hear 3D (Yeah, as if!)
So what if you have less than 4H - has congress passed a law disallowing partner to have 5 or more?
I fail to see what LTC has to do with this discussion.
The S void is a slight handicap, but a good partner won't pass with less than a decent S holding.
Gerben, as a matter of interest, what would you bid with a solid minor a couple of outside stoppers and no S stop if you can't bid 3S with that?
#16
Posted 2007-February-06, 04:45
In a pickup WC partnership...I can live with 3d.....I will make many worse errors
#18
Posted 2007-February-06, 05:54
Quote
Double followed by 3♠.

Help
