You hold:
AKxxx
X
Kxx
KQxx
Is this only worth a 1♠ opening, planning to bid 2♣ if partner does not support ♠?
Page 1 of 1
opening and rebid?
#1
Posted 2007-February-04, 23:46
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#3
Posted 2007-February-05, 00:19
Ive been experimenting with my 1nt openings
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#4
Posted 2007-February-05, 00:39
Partner wouldn't be happy if u missed maybe 6cl because of this kind of distortion. Also they wouldnt be happy when you go down in a number of NT. Of course u can tell them "I could have had xx of ♥ instead and still gone down" and u would be right, but they won't (and shouldn't) understand. The "no singleton in 1NT" is a very nice idea that hasn't been proven wrong yet (except maybe in 3rd seat semi psychic 6m331 1NT openers).
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#5
Posted 2007-February-05, 00:41
jillybean2, on Feb 5 2007, 01:19 AM, said:
Ive been experimenting with my 1nt openings 
no no no...too 1nt....
#6
Posted 2007-February-05, 01:10
jillybean2, on Feb 5 2007, 01:19 AM, said:
Ive been experimenting with my 1nt openings 
Wrong shape.
For starters, one tends to lead
a mayor against NT contracts,
if one has the choice.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#7
Posted 2007-February-05, 01:14
I believe you, Ive missed 2 major slams in as many days after partner has jumped to 3nt holding xx in my singleton
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
Page 1 of 1

Help
