Running for President
#1
Posted 2007-January-31, 23:12
#2
Posted 2007-February-01, 03:48
The evolutionary explanation is simple. In a species in which the parental burden is much higher for females than for males, the reproductive benefit of aquireing alpha status is much higher for males than for females (Genkis Khan had hundreds of children and it has been estimated that 70 million living men decent from him through the paternal line). Even if the president of the U.S. (and the English cricket coach) don't have the right to the same number of concubines as Genkis Khan had, power remains a psychological proxy for evolutionary succes. It also remains a target for evolution in modern Western societies, since smart, rich and powerfull men have the option of divorcing their first wife when she reaches menopause and remarying a young, fertile woman. And if you're a low-status man maried to a secretary, there's a fair chance that your (step) children carry the genes of your wife's boss.
#3
Posted 2007-February-01, 11:19
#4
Posted 2007-February-01, 20:53
#6
Posted 2007-February-02, 09:34
#7
Posted 2007-February-02, 10:37
#8
Posted 2007-February-02, 13:45
Quote
I stand corrected
#9
Posted 2007-February-02, 15:54
#10
Posted 2007-February-02, 16:34
mike777, on Feb 2 2007, 04:54 PM, said:
Hey! We also get plagarists, narcissists, small children (in mind) who want to be better than their daddy, POWs who had half their brain removed, and fools who are willing to shill for money.
And a Mormon. Don't ask me how he got into the race.
#11
Posted 2007-February-02, 17:36
#12
Posted 2007-February-02, 18:13
helene_t, on Feb 1 2007, 09:48 AM, said:
I can't get over the thought of the England Cricket coach with his concubines. That is seriously disturbing.
#14
Posted 2007-February-05, 07:58