MPs, all white.
♠32
♥J1032
♦KQ4
♣KJ109
(1♣)-pass-(1♥)-pass
(2♥)-pass-(2♠)*-pass
(3♣)**-pass-(3NT)-all pass
* asking
** 3 hearts, maximum values
Page 1 of 1
lead vs. 3NT
#2
Posted 2007-January-26, 13:39
♠. Their suits are splitting poorly, no reason to get active.
By the way, LHO has at least 4 clubs and probably 5 on this auction.
By the way, LHO has at least 4 clubs and probably 5 on this auction.
"Phil" on BBO
#4
Posted 2007-January-29, 15:39
Apollo81, on Jan 29 2007, 01:14 PM, said:
1 reply?
Obviously incontrovertible Noble
"Phil" on BBO
#5
Posted 2007-January-29, 16:27
I have a strong tendency to make passive leads against this sort of auction. There's a good chance the opponents just had an invitational sequence with two balanced hands (okay this is not 100% clear given their methods, but I think it's odds on).
So I'd go with a spade. At least partner is essentially marked with some length there, and it doesn't give anything away.
So I'd go with a spade. At least partner is essentially marked with some length there, and it doesn't give anything away.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#6
Posted 2007-January-30, 08:27
♣J. As likely to blow a trick as a spade but can be productive to our side on a couple layouts.
#7
Posted 2007-January-30, 08:45
K of D
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#8
Posted 2007-January-30, 11:38
♣J
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
#9
Posted 2007-January-30, 12:00
3NTE
On a club lead, declarer can easily come to 9 tricks.
On a spade lead, the play is pretty interesting.
Scoring: IMP
On a club lead, declarer can easily come to 9 tricks.
On a spade lead, the play is pretty interesting.
Page 1 of 1

Help
