Help
Speaking for myself only, I would open 2D without a second's thought if it came up at the table.
You're quite sure of yourself
Peter
3rd seat question 5 AT3 Q7652 QJ92
#21
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,153
- Joined: 2003-February-28
Posted 2007-January-24, 12:39
"I'm quite scared that people are even contemplating opening with this hand. I'm sure it's because it was put into a poll and suggested that some might open it that people are looking for reasons to do so. Because I'm fairly sure that most of you would pass this without a second's thought if it came up at the table?"
Speaking for myself only, I would open 2D without a second's thought if it came up at the table.
You're quite sure of yourself
Peter
Speaking for myself only, I would open 2D without a second's thought if it came up at the table.
You're quite sure of yourself
Peter
#22
- Under bidder
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,797
- Joined: 2004-July-25
- Gender:Male
- Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Posted 2008-September-29, 21:56
I would bid 1D.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#23
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,611
- Joined: 2006-March-18
Posted 2008-September-29, 23:33
Pass. better diamond suit quality and i might bid 1♦...2♣ or just 2♦
#24
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 475
- Joined: 2008-March-07
- Gender:Male
- Location:Oulu, Finland
- Interests:How to find out shape below 2NT.
Posted 2008-September-30, 01:06
If I must open, it's 10-12NT. 2♦ second choice but it doesn't appeal too much since majors are really easy to find still and my suit is horrible.
#25
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 187
- Joined: 2006-August-07
Posted 2008-September-30, 02:12
I do not like 1♦ (lead directing ?) and since 2♦ is not available, it is either 3♦ pr PAss. I have found that 3♦ works more often that it should (and since by agreement it can be almost anything partner will not rush to lead diamond). Think it is a close call , will go with the field and pass if not the right time for swingy action (doing very well or just not the right momentum)
#26
- Andy Bowles
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,993
- Joined: 2007-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
Posted 2008-September-30, 02:30
2♦. I like partner to be able to bid sensibly opposite a 3rd-hand opening at the one-level, so my openings aren't very different from in first seat. Two-bids are different.
Like Apollo81, I'd like to have ♦10, but you have to work with what you were given.
Like Apollo81, I'd like to have ♦10, but you have to work with what you were given.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#27
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-March-07
- Gender:Male
- Location:Laos
- Interests:Wagner and Bridge
Posted 2008-September-30, 02:44
gnasher, on Sep 30 2008, 03:30 PM, said:
you have to work with what you were given.
I agree. Pass.
Just realised, this thread is over a year old. What's up, Han?
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#28
- Under bidder
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,797
- Joined: 2004-July-25
- Gender:Male
- Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Posted 2008-September-30, 06:33
Ah yes, you are right.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#29
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2008-September-30, 08:26
I mentioned in another thread that many in this Forum open the bidding anytime they hold 13 cards.
This is another case in point.
(I bet they would open a strong 2♣ if they held 14 cards).
This is another case in point.
(I bet they would open a strong 2♣ if they held 14 cards).
#30
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,151
- Joined: 2003-June-11
- Location:Southern California
Posted 2008-September-30, 09:07
ArtK78, on Sep 30 2008, 06:26 AM, said:
I mentioned in another thread that many in this Forum open the bidding anytime they hold 13 cards.
This is another case in point.
(I bet they would open a strong 2♣ if they held 14 cards).
This is another case in point.
(I bet they would open a strong 2♣ if they held 14 cards).
There's better examples than this. We are 3rd chair green, so that gives a license.
It's funny, I was reading this, and I saw pleighton's comment and I thought this was really old LOL.
I still pass by the way, but my reason is that I think there is a reasonable chance this will get passed out, and bidding just makes it easy for them to bid their majors.
2♦ is a 2nd choice, not 1♦, but 2♦ randomizes the results.
"Phil" on BBO
#31
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,001
- Joined: 2005-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
- Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.
Posted 2008-September-30, 09:14
I would open 2♦. I am just not going to sit there and let the opps have all the space they need when they hold the majors. Ok... so partner was 5-5-1-2 with a bad hand. Next.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#32
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,211
- Joined: 2006-April-22
Posted 2008-September-30, 09:41
1H. Any seat, any scoring.
#33
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,727
- Joined: 2006-June-05
- Location:Oslo, Norway
- Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy
Posted 2008-September-30, 14:03
Normally a clear pass.
Under some circumstances I might chose something else, of course. No idea why this thread was reopened....
Under some circumstances I might chose something else, of course. No idea why this thread was reopened....
Kind regards,
Harald
Harald