BBO Discussion Forums: Is it a singleton (you want to admit)? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Is it a singleton (you want to admit)? Bare K/A, when in a major-fit!

Poll: Will you show a bare K/A as a singleton? (23 member(s) have cast votes)

Will you show a bare K/A as a singleton?

  1. No, never (3 votes [13.04%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.04%

  2. No, never for K, but always OK for A (1 votes [4.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.35%

  3. No, never for A, but always OK for K (2 votes [8.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.70%

  4. Sometimes, Partner/I judge from time-to-time (10 votes [43.48%])

    Percentage of vote: 43.48%

  5. Sometimes, but always after GF-support, ex 1Ma-2NT, 3New (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. Sometimes, but always as GF-Splinters, ex 1Ma-4New (1 votes [4.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.35%

  7. Sometimes, but always in trialbids, ex Romex 1Ma-2Ma, 3New (1 votes [4.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.35%

  8. Yes, always (5 votes [21.74%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.74%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   nielsfoged 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 71
  • Joined: 2006-January-02

Posted 2007-January-15, 15:08

When the partnership has a major-fit, do you then admit to holding a side-suit singleton, when it is the K or A bare?
0

#2 User is online   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,910
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2007-January-15, 15:17

Yes. Why not?

If he has xx or xxx, how does denying a singleton, when holding the K, advance the auction intelligently?

As for the stiff A... you may well have a chance to cue-bid this suit later, and partner will usually be delighted to learn that you have NO losers...again, imagine xx or xxx or equivalent.

About the only time I would not show a stiff K would be when I was truly ashamed of my opening bid.... maybe I only have 9 or a poor 10 hcp outside of the K. If I have even a borderline opening bid without the K, I will show it.

Edit: I didn't read all of the poll options: I would not splinter into a stiff A (there are always other ways to bid the hand) and I would only splinter into a stiff K if it seemed the most logical way to probe, and if my hand without the K was worth the bid.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#3 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2007-January-15, 15:32

I put down "yes" but that was for my favorite system and there's a caveat. We show our shape exactly, but then when showing our controls, we do not count a singleton K (but do count a singleton A). Having bid many hands with this approach, this can be a positive or negative. It can be a positive, when partner knows that all of my controls are outside of my singleton (and stiff A's are easy to infer when I don't show other controls elsewhere). It can be a negative when my stiff is a K and it fills in partner's suit nicely. For example if he has AQJxx or Axx and knows the K will be useful.

In a standard system, I will generally not splinter into a stiff A or stiff K, although with a stiff K, I imagine it's a judgment issue. If partner opened 1 and I held AQxxx QJx JTx K I would splinter as I will have difficulty cue-bidding the hand. So why not get across that feature of my hand in one bid?
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#4 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-January-15, 15:49

depends on situation
0

#5 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-January-15, 16:12

it always depends but usually I would not show stiff king and would often show stiff ace.
0

#6 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,571
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2007-January-15, 16:56

I would try not to, but if I didn't have much other choice then I would.
0

#7 User is offline   Halo 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 875
  • Joined: 2006-June-08

Posted 2007-January-15, 17:14

I recently had smeone in conversation say you shouldn't splinter A singelton.

Why not?
0

#8 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,051
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2007-January-15, 19:29

Look at it from partner's viewpoint. If you had KQx in a suit, and partner splintered in that suit, would you upgrade or downgrade your hand?
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#9 User is offline   ricardoz 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 2007-January-17

Posted 2007-January-17, 19:38

Apollo81, on Jan 15 2007, 04:49 PM, said:

depends on situation

Have you any that you could share?
0

#10 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-January-17, 19:46

I almost always sell my hand as semi-balanced in those cases. Splintering with ace works badly when partner has KQx (he should devalue them, but not as much as the splinter suggests). Splintering with the king seems worse, as the king pulls value when partner has honors in the suit - exactly when partner will devalue his honors.

I would never splinter with Matt's example hand AQxxx QJx JTx K, no matter where you add the 13th card, instead just make a forcing raise. Isn't it more interesting to get to know if partner has shortness? Or whether he has a second suit in hearts (excellent), diamonds (bad) or clubs (good)?

Arend
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#11 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2007-January-17, 19:53

cherdano, on Jan 17 2007, 05:46 PM, said:

I almost always sell my hand as semi-balanced in those cases. Splintering with ace works badly when partner has KQx (he should devalue them, but not as much as the splinter suggests). Splintering with the king seems worse, as the king pulls value when partner has honors in the suit - exactly when partner will devalue his honors.

I would never splinter with Matt's example hand AQxxx QJx JTx K, no matter where you add the 13th card, instead just make a forcing raise. Isn't it more interesting to get to know if partner has shortness? Or whether he has a second suit in hearts (excellent), diamonds (bad) or clubs (good)?

Arend

Perhaps a better (if not more extreme) example:

AKJxx xxx xxxx K

13 cards for you this time. :)

Here you know partner has bad trumps. You have nothing to cue bid. So you find out partner has shortness: in hearts (good), in diamonds (good), in clubs (do opps have a pulse?). Now what? You can cue bid once in clubs, but that's it. If partner shows you a second suit (even clubs), you have nothing to say. So I think that a splinter would get the hand off your chest and leave it up to partner to do the rest.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#12 User is offline   000002 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 337
  • Joined: 2005-August-02

Posted 2007-January-17, 20:26

yes on 2cases,assume pd open 1
1)hurried .
for instance:i hold 1444 facing an overcall 1
2)a lot of need on side.
example:
A
AQxxx
Qxx
Qxxx

REGARDS 000002
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users