To Bid or Not to Bid

5 Pages
←
1
2
3
4
→
Last »

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

To Bid or Not to Bid Responding to Overcalls

#21 pbleighton

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3,153
Joined: 2003-February-28

Posted 2006-December-30, 19:50

"The top of of the overcall does have some bearing, but even then you can easily get too high with a 13-14 count and a 6-card suit, no?"

A good 14, yes.

13s, hardly ever.

I can be pretty pushy bidding games when we open the bidding, especially with the opps silent, but when the opps start the bidding, i'm not nearly so optimistic.

Peter

#22 kenrexford

Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 9,586
Joined: 2005-September-21
Gender:Male
Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2006-December-30, 19:56

inquiry, on Dec 30 2006, 02:14 PM, said:

Since you titled this to bid or not to bid, sounds like a larry issue. LOTT says bid, but this is imps and we are vul. Partner will stretch to bid game, and I don't want to encourage him. So here, I will violate LOTT (sorry Larry) and pass. Also, I really, really don't like 4333 distribution, so in cases of close decisions, i go softly, as in this case.

I agree with this analysis, with one addition. When in doubt, I raise with lead-acceptance value and decline without. This might lead me to be more willing, for instance, to compete to the two-level at IMP's with a similar hand but Kx in trumps instead. With queens everywhere, and poor trumps, I expect that partner may end up on lead with no good apparent options. The last "bad option" I want him to pick is spades.

I did stop for a moment on one other comment, concerning not leading partner into thinking that I only have two trumps. This intrigues me for reasons similar to what I stated before and is a concern.

"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.

#23 Winstonm

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 17,289
Joined: 2005-January-08
Gender:Male
Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
Interests:Art, music

Posted 2006-December-30, 20:00

pbleighton, on Dec 30 2006, 08:50 PM, said:

Here, Peter, I'm not so worried about overbidding to game but in overbidding to the 3-level.

Even for LOTT advocates, this 4333 argues for a reduction in total tricks, so assuming 17 total tricks to start that is reduced to 16 - according to LOTT if they can make 9 tricks we can only make 7, down 2.

It is not that the 4333 hand will bid 3, but partner is not excluded from bidding 3 with heart shortness and dummy will surely disappoint.

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

#24 pbleighton

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3,153
Joined: 2003-February-28

Posted 2006-December-30, 20:06

"It is not that the 4333 hand will bid 3, but partner is not excluded from bidding 3 with heart shortness and dummy will surely disappoint."

Winston, your point is taken, in theory anyway, but I have been doing this for a while and the types of problems you point out are rare.

Have you played the slut style much? :huh:

Peter

#25 mike777

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 18,098
Joined: 2003-October-07
Gender:Male

Posted 2006-December-30, 20:13

The good news is all low level x's will be for takeout so the hope is we can push them to three and if we have a ten card fit they will not be able to double us in 3s. Competing aggressively at imp partscores per Italians.

As a side note it is interesting that in the Spingold the Italians bid 6 deals to game that the Nickell team only bid to a partscore out of 64 boards. All 6 game bids went down and still the Italians almost won.

#26 Winstonm

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 17,289
Joined: 2005-January-08
Gender:Male
Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
Interests:Art, music

Posted 2006-December-30, 20:15

pbleighton, on Dec 30 2006, 09:06 PM, said:

Peter

Peter, I didn't even know there was a slut style - it was always the lack of style that attracted me. :angry:

Of course, my views are slanted because I don't play a lot of matchpoints, and I'd say when the object of the game is frequency of gain/loss instead of total gain/loss that there is a lot to be said for mixing it up more.

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

#27 pbleighton

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3,153
Joined: 2003-February-28

Posted 2006-December-30, 20:21

"Peter, I didn't even know there was a slut style"

The excitement is... infectious :huh:

"Of course, my views are slanted because I don't play a lot of matchpoints, and I'd say when the object of the game is frequency of gain/loss instead of total gain/loss that there is a lot to be said for mixing it up more."

Well, much to your surprise I'm sure, I play mostly matchpoints :angry:

Peter

#28 Guest_Jlall_*

Group: Guests

Posted 2006-December-30, 20:33

Winstonm, on Dec 30 2006, 08:24 PM, said:

Jlall, on Dec 30 2006, 06:57 PM, said:

Winstonm, on Dec 30 2006, 06:35 PM, said:

I find it interesting that so far everyone is assuming a 9-card fit - how many of those also are proponents of 4-card overcalls?

I think you're wrong on this one. Think about the type of hands you make 4 card overcalls with. They likely have some heart length, otherwise you would make a t/o X. Given that we know partner is short in hearts, I would say there are EXTREMELY low odds that he has a 4 card overcall.

Sure it's unlikely - but there is: AKQx, x, xxx, Axxxx so it is within the realms of possibilties, and I've seen some espouse much worse than this.

Still, that's not the point of it all - it's whether it is better to have a more constructive minimum raise agreement or not.

umm...I overcall a LOT with 4 card suits but I would think that not Xing over 1H with that is just horrible, there's no reason other than lead value to misdescribe your hand when you have a perfectly normal X available, and you'll probably be on lead yourself.

Anyways, I agree with you that none of that is really the point.

Quote

In constructive bidding, we are required to bid opposite an opening 1S bid as partner can have just short of a 2C bid, but when the overcall is somewhat limited we do not have that constraint. Would your views change if RHO had passed or doubled?

I would raise MORE aggressively after an overcall than an opening (where I would bid 1N sometimes with a fit). In competitive auctions it's more important to raise than in uncontested auctions, especially when there is a risk that they will buy the hand if it's passed out. The raise here is not for constructive merits, it is to fight for the partscore. Obviously if partner is about to bid game or guaranteed me he would balance I would rather pass, but I have no such guarantees.

As for if RHO had passed or Xed, I would still raise because the QTx is not such a downgrade anymore (its much more likely to be useful if they don't raise).

#29 flytoox

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,606
Joined: 2003-June-06

Posted 2006-December-30, 20:46

I vote for pass. 4333 and defensive cards. I dont want to encourage pd to bid on.

#30 Winstonm

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 17,289
Joined: 2005-January-08
Gender:Male
Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
Interests:Art, music

Posted 2006-December-30, 21:02

Quote

The raise here is not for constructive merits, it is to fight for the partscore.

But isn't the point whether or not you should be fighting for the partscore?

Give partner a normal overcall of AKxxx, xx, Axx, xxx and all we accomplish is giving up -200 at the two level most likely. And if we push them to 3H, they are most apt to make.

If partner has a little better, AKQxxx, x, J10x, Axx, and we can easily go for -200 at 3S and partner is unlikely to pass out 2H.

In my dim wits, to fight for the partscore only makes sense when I actually might make my partscore contract - I don't care so much if I give up -110 verses -100.

So to me it seems the risks of getting overboard outweigh any advantage in contracting for a raise, especially when the hands where we are most likly to make 2S partner will not sell out. Granted, there are hands that can be constructed where 2S makes and partner does not have a balancing call - but when you weigh those hands against the number of hands where 2S and 3S are both way too high it is probably a washout.

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

#31 Winstonm

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 17,289
Joined: 2005-January-08
Gender:Male
Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
Interests:Art, music

Posted 2006-December-30, 21:04

Quote

As a side note it is interesting that in the Spingold the Italians bid 6 deals to game that the Nickell team only bid to a partscore out of 64 boards. All 6 game bids went down and still the Italians almost won.

See. If they would have stopped short on even on of those and made a partscore they would have won - would have won in a cakewalk stopping in all 6.

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

#32 dake50

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,211
Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2006-December-30, 22:47

Seems 2S here, but the interesting question is 'If this is single raise bottom, how are better raises partitioned if at all? Single raise: 1Q working(1 trick expected) + 3+support; what do X, 2NT, 3S, P describe? System considerations allow this weak to bid? What are/should they be?

#33 Guest_Jlall_*

Group: Guests

Posted 2006-December-30, 23:19

Winstonm, on Dec 30 2006, 10:02 PM, said:

Give partner a normal overcall of AKxxx, xx, Axx, xxx and all we accomplish is giving up -200 at the two level most likely. And if we push them to 3H, they are most apt to make.

That is very pessimistic

If partner has this the opps are going to bid 3H probably 85 % of the time in real life. People don't sell out to 2S with a large majority of the high cards and very few high cards and no length in spades very often. When they do sell out it's very likely spades are 2-2. If spades are 2-2 we have a lot of chances for -1 (HJx of hearts onside on a normal heart lead, AK of clubs onside, DK onside, etc). Even if we go -2 it doesn't really matter at imps. Much more likely is that they will get to 3H down. Sure 3H will usually make but we have chances for a club trick, one or two spade tricks, one or two diamond tricks, a heart trick, etc. Thinking they're just going to make it is very pessimistic. All I know is I would much rather be defending 2H than 3H, and if I was playing 2S instead of bidding 2H I wouldn't really mind. If partner had this hand I am SURE it would be right to bid 2S.

Quote

If partner has a little better, AKQxxx, x, J10x, Axx, and we can easily go for -200 at 3S and partner is unlikely to pass out 2H.

-200 in 3S? You are very unlucky

They would have to get a diamond ruff and the club would have to be offside. If that is the case they are cold for at least 4H. Isn't it more likely that you'll make 3S when they are cold for 3 and maybe 4 hearts?

Partner wouldn't pass out 2H with that hand, but what if LHO bid 3H? Maybe he would bid 3S anyways, but maybe not.

It's strange because the example hands you gave to back up pass might have been hands I chose to back up a 2S bid

#34 neilkaz

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3,568
Joined: 2006-June-28
Gender:Male
Location:Barrington IL USA
Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2006-December-30, 23:30

This is a very difficult decision and as much I want to pass this 3 queens of garbage I cannot do it even when 4333 since we almost certainly have 9+♠.

I do trust that PD will not bury me for supporting with support and will invite me to game with most of his very good overcalls rather than blasting to a dead 4♠x.

.. neilkaz ..

#35 whereagles

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 14,900
Joined: 2004-May-11
Gender:Male
Location:Portugal
Interests:Everything!

Posted 2006-December-31, 01:06

Opposite an overbidder pard, PASS on the spot. Opposite a saner pard, I suppose I could mutter 2♠.

#36 mike777

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 18,098
Joined: 2003-October-07
Gender:Male

Posted 2006-December-31, 01:53

whereagles, on Dec 31 2006, 02:06 AM, said:

Opposite an overbidder pard, PASS on the spot. Opposite a saner pard, I suppose I could mutter 2♠.

And which pard are you

#37 whereagles

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 14,900
Joined: 2004-May-11
Gender:Male
Location:Portugal
Interests:Everything!

Posted 2006-December-31, 03:21

I'm aggressive, but not reckless

#38 ulven

Group: Full Members
Posts: 294
Joined: 2005-October-21
Gender:Male
Location:South Sweden
Interests:Real name: Ulf Nilsson
Semi-pro player.

Posted 2006-December-31, 03:37

This isn't so much about style and LOTT; this is about sanity and hand evaluation. This is an easy pass. Will not be correct every time, but statistically I'm sure it's not even close.

- Horrible shape.
- Can't stand lead.
- No aces/kings.
- Vuln.
- If p overcalled light, raise may help them bid a game not attempted otherwise. With this hand, not clear if that's godd/bad (depends a bit on heart J etc.).

"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong."
- R. Buckminster Fuller

#39 mike777

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 18,098
Joined: 2003-October-07
Gender:Male

Posted 2006-December-31, 04:50

why is pard overcalling light when vul?...no why is pard overcalling at unfav vul...does he think our leads are idiotic if he does not bid?

#40 000002

Group: Full Members
Posts: 337
Joined: 2005-August-02

Posted 2006-December-31, 05:35

i vote 2♠ raising
but i am sorry to say that i don't read the whole replying article about passing,because i am very busy now

((((((((((((((((((

regards 000002

5 Pages
←
1
2
3
4
→
Last »

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

BBO Discussion Forums: To Bid or Not to Bid - BBO Discussion Forums

To Bid or Not to Bid Responding to Overcalls

#21 pbleighton

#22 kenrexford

#23 Winstonm

#24 pbleighton

#25 mike777

#26 Winstonm

#27 pbleighton

#28 Guest_Jlall_*

#29 flytoox

#30 Winstonm

#31 Winstonm

#32 dake50

#33 Guest_Jlall_*

#34 neilkaz

#35 whereagles

#36 mike777

#37 whereagles

#38 ulven

#39 mike777

#40 000002

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Delete Post

Skin and Language

Execution Stats

BBO Discussion Forums: To Bid or Not to Bid - BBO Discussion Forums

To Bid or Not to Bid Responding to Overcalls

#28 Guest_Jlall_*

#33 Guest_Jlall_*

1 User(s) are reading this topic 0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Delete Post

Skin and Language

Execution Stats

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users