BBO Discussion Forums: why not 6H? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

why not 6H? which bid do you dislike most?

#21 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2006-December-20, 13:38

Perhaps PD was thinking along these lines...

"With that monster hand even the cat sitting next to my keyboard would have made a more serious slam try"..."of course I know that a direct jump to 3♥ is slamish with 6+ ♥" ... "I bid 3NT after the double of your 2 card suit (like most, I play that 3♣ shows a 2nd suit) since I wasn't concerned about being set by a ♣ lead, so you should have realized ♣ was not a problem and gone for slam".
... "this is our 3rd missunderstanding, so I think I'll go find someone else to play with for the next few hands"

Excuse my sarcasm, but don't be offended when PD leaves.

Anyhow, this doesn't excuse PD's 3NT bid with his really good hand for slam after hearing your 3♣ bid.

.. neilkaz ..
0

#22 User is offline   sdoty 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 55
  • Joined: 2003-July-22

Posted 2006-December-20, 13:58

I place the blame on both sides, but the bid I hate the most is 3NT.

I have some sympathy for starting with a basic transfer and then faking a 3C bid. I think it's obviously bad, but I've been in positions where I seriously doubted that partner would correctly interpret the bid I -wanted- to make... even if it was a 'straightforward' one. At least you can feel confident that 3C is forcing.

4H seems too conservative, but if you didn't trust partner to handle any of the other possible bids over 2H correctly, I can see how after 3NT it would feel like a "4H or 6H?" shot in the dark.

I can't, however, muster any sympathy for the 3NT bid. How could 3H over 3C possibly be misinterpreted? (okay -- your regular partner might infer that you don't have a diamond control, but worrying about that with a pick-up seems silly. and it still doesn't make 3NT make any sense.) :)

Susan
0

#23 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2006-December-21, 07:23

I wouldn't dare 1N - 3♥ or similar, and also won't count on partner realizing that 1N - 2♦ - 2♥ - 4♥ is a slam try which in my opinion is the right way to approach the hand: Partner I am very strong but I lack controls, do you have some? 3NT is the worst bid of the sequence.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#24 User is offline   frouu 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 90
  • Joined: 2007-January-13

Posted 2007-January-13, 22:45

I agree with Gerben42. If partnership uses both texas & jacoby transfers, with 6 hearts; use jacoby for slam try, texas for sign off at 4♥. i.e: 1NT/2♦/2♥/4♥ is slam try while 1NT/4♦/4♥ is sign-off.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users