Posted 2006-December-18, 15:29
I wish, at this point, that I had led the ♠10 (or the 9) to dummy at trick 2. Then I would be leading the ♥Q to ruff away the K and playing A and a low ♠, hooking LHO out of Jxxx of the suit broke as the play of the 8 hints.
Was the small ♠ at trick 2 an error? Tough call. If LHO holds J8xx then (unless we somehow ran the spade spot) we'd be going down once the ♣ hook lost. But when he holds Jxxx, we are going down when the ♣ hook loses unless ♦ are 3-3.
J8xx is twice as probable as Jxxx, but ♦ will be 4-2 significantly more often than they are 3-3, especially once we factor in 3-4♥ and 4-1♠.
As it is, we did not make what now looks as if it would have been the effective play in trump, and we must decide whether to play trump to be 3-2 or ♦ to be 3-3.
If trump are 3-2 the play is trivial: we do not even need to set up the ♥8. If trump are 4-1, we need ♦ to be 3-3 (or RHO to be an improbable 1=4=2=6).
I am going to play a trump to the A, because if both follow, I claim. When RHO shows out, I play on ♦s.... if they are 3-3, the opps are dead.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari