Balancing decision after a strong club
#1 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2006-November-10, 12:04
#2
Posted 2006-November-10, 13:07
I suspect that I will probably have cost my side a trick by my bidding because I am going to get a ♠ lead and that will hurt if partner has Ax or Kx. But that is not enough reason to make another bid, altho 2♠ here should show a bad suit: else I would have opened 2♠.
I would expect 2♠ to win more frequently than it loses, but to rarely win big and to occasionally lose huge, so I pass. Besides, I am the wrong side of 50 to bid again here.
#3
Posted 2006-November-10, 19:34
#4
Posted 2006-November-10, 20:50
#5
Posted 2006-November-11, 01:59
Jlall, on Nov 10 2006, 01:04 PM, said:
Pass. I figure I'm lucky LHO didn't bring down the hammer.
Re: "red/white". I know this construction is widespread, but it leaves me bemused. I learned it this way:
Red: We're vul, they aren't.
Yellow (or amber): both vul.
White: nobody vul.
Green: We're not vul, they're vul.
So "red/white" makes no sense to me.
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#6
Posted 2006-November-11, 03:52
#7
Posted 2006-November-11, 05:51
If I'm going to climb out on a limb, I want to do so before the opps aquire a saw.
Peter
#8
Posted 2006-November-11, 08:02
#9
Posted 2006-November-11, 08:49
Now that I've survived this, I find myself in the balance chair. Pard heard my vulnerable overcall, and we certainly don't have a 9 card spade fit. Notwithstanding that immediate action over a strong club shows a weaker hand than delayed action that shows strength, pard could have bid something over 2♥. Without discussion, I would think a double of 2♥ by pard is penalty.
However, what bothers me most about the hand is the short hearts and 3-3 in the minors. Pard could have a very vanilla 1=3=?=? 13 count and not have a call available over 2♥. Thats another reason not to get involved. If pard was planning some strong 'delayed' action our 1♠ call may have preempted the action too high, and made it appear we have a misfit. I might be putting my neck on the block here, but I'll try to win 6 IMPs with the occasional risk of conceding 14 if its a bloodbath. I think the odds favor bidding and I've talked myself into a balancing double.
#10
Posted 2006-November-11, 09:21
#11
Posted 2006-November-11, 14:05
Too much risk; too little gain.
I pass.
BTW, I agree with the 1S action due to the nature of the 1C auction as I presume 1S here shows a weaker holding than pass. 9 losers is too much at this vul to jump in with a unilateral 2S so 1S it is - if we can compete and if we do have a plus-score in the offing, it almost has to be in spades. Once a non-good-fit in spades is announced by partner's subsequent pass, I have made my try and can pass without remorse.
#12 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2006-November-11, 18:04
As for now, I was STILL concerned it was our partscore lol. The opps have stopped in 2H so partner is marked with a pretty decent hand. Yet he didn't bid over 1C, very strange. I figured his heart stack couldn't be that good as he didnt overcall immediately, and he probably had some balanced hand since he hadnt bid yet. If partner has say, a balanced 14 count, 2H and 2S both rate to make. So I chose to bid 2S. Partner was actually 1345 with a bad club suit and 15 highs so he figured he'd get a chance to bid NT or X spades later.
#13
Posted 2006-November-12, 09:17
Jlall, on Nov 12 2006, 12:04 AM, said:
As for now, I was STILL concerned it was our partscore lol. The opps have stopped in 2H so partner is marked with a pretty decent hand. Yet he didn't bid over 1C, very strange. I figured his heart stack couldn't be that good as he didnt overcall immediately, and he probably had some balanced hand since he hadnt bid yet. If partner has say, a balanced 14 count, 2H and 2S both rate to make. So I chose to bid 2S. Partner was actually 1345 with a bad club suit and 15 highs so he figured he'd get a chance to bid NT or X spades later.
Agree that 2♠ now is more suicidal than opening it
Now, that this might be our hand is more debatable. In any case, since pard, which is marked with a good hand and knows our shape, didn't act, he must surely have had a reason not to. Being the weak hand and having shown a great deal of it already, I don't feel there's any need to stretch and take decisions.
By the way, it's not strange that pard sits quiet over a strong club with a good hand. That's part of the normal strategy vs precision et al.
#14
Posted 2006-November-15, 00:38
#15
Posted 2006-November-15, 04:39
Jlall, on Nov 12 2006, 01:04 AM, said:
A well prepared partnership still has the possibility to figure out a heart fit or if partner is semi positive. I usually play MOSCITO with symmetric relays after 1♣, and if we get an intervention like this, we use pass as extras! Double is a general takeout double with a minimum hand. So bidding 1♠ doesn't take away anything at all. That's why I'd bid 2♠ on the first round, as aggressive as it is, to take some actual space away from them...

Help
