Lots of points, bad hand preempted auction
#1 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2006-November-10, 11:58
#2
Posted 2006-November-10, 12:06
KQTxxx xx Axx Kx
AQxxxx x Axx Kxx
If I'm bidding 4♣ seems like the call.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#3
Posted 2006-November-10, 13:15
4♣ seems ok if partner is on the same wavelength, but should he be playing me for a hand like this, with no true ♠ support, or should he be playing me for a better supporting hand, with slam interest opposite a heavy 3♠. Say Jxxx xxx Kx AQJx: where slam is good opposite AKxxxx x Axx Kxx?
My choice is 4♠, knowing that I may well be failing when 5 or even 6 of either minor may be making. I just don't think 4♣ is this hand and I am concerned that we will end up in a confusing auction. Say he bids 4♦ over 4♣: is it clear that he is showing another possible trump suit, or is he cueing? I am sure that many posters will know that their partner will be on their wavelength, but I am not so sure.
#5
Posted 2006-November-10, 13:27
I pass, trying to go plus.
Any suit bid, would indicate
fit, and my partner rather wants
to play the 10 trick game instead
of a 11 trick game.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#6
Posted 2006-November-10, 13:58
whereagles, on Nov 10 2006, 02:25 PM, said:
Visualization at bridge is an important aspect of getting better. Justin is just helping everyone learn to visualize better in their mind rather than drawing pretty pictures on the page for us.
Too bad I can not double 3♠ for takeout to a minor... darn the luck. Ok, I will not pass here. So it is a guess, and I don't like any of the alternatives. But I dislike pass the most. I think I bid 4♠ and hope it does go loud and vicious double on my left.
#7 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2006-November-10, 14:04
whereagles, on Nov 10 2006, 02:25 PM, said:
lol...I know, i tried using the diagrams once and I kept getting confused as to who was where etc lol. But yeah I understand I kind of write my problems like a stream of conciousness
#8
Posted 2006-November-10, 14:17
#9
Posted 2006-November-10, 15:12
Jlall, on Nov 10 2006, 05:58 PM, said:
Here's how you could do it with minimum effort
red/red imps. You hold
J
Jx
KJ9x
AT8xxx
RHO you LHO pard
2H..pass..3H....3S
pass..??
aaah, much better now... think I bid 4♣ then:)
#10
Posted 2006-November-10, 19:23
But let's have a closer look. According to the Rule of Seven, when partner enters an auction in which the opponents have preempted, he should be playing me for seven points. I have more, and most of them rate to be well placed. If I thought 4♥ would be interpreted as pick-a-game, I would bid it but it seems like a slam try in support of spades to me. I would bid 4♣ and plan to play game in whatever suit North named next (over 4♥, I would try 6♣).
#11
Posted 2006-November-11, 06:16
2♥ pass 3♥ 3 ♠
pass 4 ♣ pass
I would not believe, that you had:
J
Jx
KJ9x
AT8xxx
So 4 Club won't be my choice, I would bid 4 Spade accepting my fate if this is not right.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#12
Posted 2006-November-11, 07:20
#13
Posted 2006-November-11, 14:26
#15
Posted 2006-November-11, 17:05
Winstonm, on Nov 11 2006, 08:26 PM, said:
huh? Pard is in sandwich after opps showed a likely 9+ hearts. He doesn't have to have the world, let alone 5 good spades. He might very well have a mere
AQxxx
xxx
AQx
Kx
#16 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2006-November-11, 18:07
#17
Posted 2006-November-15, 00:37

Help
