Competing Or Not
#1
Posted 2006-November-05, 20:44
You have K8-AQ1098-9-AJ872.You open 1H, and it goes P-1S(your P)-2D.
Your call?
Peter
#2
Posted 2006-November-05, 20:47
Playing good/bad 2nt I choose 3clubs...I could bid 2nt(not natural) if weaker.
Partner will expect 0-2 spades in my hand very often.
#3
Posted 2006-November-05, 21:05
Peter
#5
Posted 2006-November-05, 21:23
pbleighton, on Nov 5 2006, 10:05 PM, said:
Peter
No but extra's.
I would say at least 14 hcp and 2 good suits.
That means with a game force hand I need to come up something else? Cuebid since I play support x here or 2nt(good/bad) and rebid over forced 3clubs with more?
#6
Posted 2006-November-05, 22:00
If I want to GF I can Q-bid 3♦ if options like good/bad 2NT and/or sup X aren't being played.
.. neilkaz ..
#7
Posted 2006-November-05, 22:38
I play both good/bad 2NT and support doubles so 2NT to show a distribution bid 'with less than three spades.'
Mike777 If 3C shows 14+HCP and two good suits, what do you do with 17-18HCP?
Partner gets to take a view of your bid showing 14-18 with no room to explore.
Regards,
Robert
#9
Posted 2006-November-06, 00:43
Robert, on Nov 5 2006, 11:38 PM, said:
I play both good/bad 2NT and support doubles so 2NT to show a distribution bid 'with less than three spades.'
Mike777 If 3C shows 14+HCP and two good suits, what do you do with 17-18HCP?
Partner gets to take a view of your bid showing 14-18 with no room to explore.
Regards,
Robert
I guess i could cuebid or bid 2nt(good/bad) and rebid showing some max but non game force?
In truth I hardly ever have 17-18 nonbalanced game force hands/ on this exact bidding?
#10
Posted 2006-November-06, 02:59
pbleighton, on Nov 5 2006, 10:05 PM, said:
Peter
Hi,
depends on the meaning of 2NT (good-bad).
I play, that the weaker hands get bid direct,
i.e. 3C is nonforcing.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#11
Posted 2006-November-06, 04:56
#12
Posted 2006-November-06, 07:41
Dbl keeps bidding low and allows pard to select a suit or passing for penalties. In fact, it's a textbook example of a Robson/Segal take-out double.

Help
