Your bid?
#1
Posted 2006-October-30, 06:36
Partner deals, none vul, MP
Q83
T7642
83
A92
1♣ (1♥) Pass (2♥)
3♣ (3♥) ?
Do you agree with the first pass, and what do you bid now? What would you do if RHO had passed (as happened at some tables)?
John
#2
Posted 2006-October-30, 08:40
Now I think I am left with a nasty problem and four options: Pass, Dbl, 3NT and 4♣. At matchpoints I think I'll double and lead a trump, with 4♣ my second choice. Given the auction I cannot have a penalty pass and so partner can remove with poor defence and very long clubs. Whether he can do this after my five minute hesitation is less clear
Good problem for a bidding panel.
Paul
#3
Posted 2006-October-30, 11:21
#4
Posted 2006-October-30, 11:32
It would be useful to be playing some form of good/bad or bad/good 2N so that I could tell how good partner's 3♣ bid was. Was it merely competitive or does he really have a good hand? Axx void Axx KJxxxxx surely gives me a good play for game.
Now, maybe that game should be 3N, but that is putting all of my eggs in one basket, and I doubt that I'd ever make an overtrick, so there is no advantage to 3N over 5♣, if both make, and 5♣ rates to be slightly safer:
AJx void KQx KQJxxxx: 3N is going to fail most times but 5♣ is on ice.
I wouldn't double. I doubt that I'd beat a good opp more than 1 and never 500.
#5 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2006-October-30, 12:03
#6
Posted 2006-October-30, 12:55
#7
Posted 2006-October-30, 16:38
#8
Posted 2006-October-31, 05:18
No-one has commented on what they would bid if RHO passed (instead of 3♥). That was what happened at most tables, and it changes the problem somewhat.
The reason I said "no relevant agreements" was partly to see if "good/bad" would be standard with an expert partner in this position (I did not expect this partner to play that convention), and if not what the panel would expect for a minimum 3♣ bid. Pclayton (and probably some of the other 4♣ bidders) expects partner to bid again with Mike's example hands. The first of these was:
Axx
-
Axx
KJxxxxx
5♣ got good play (only needs the spade King with the opponent who has shown the strongest hand), but isn't this very close to a minimum 3♣? Partner has already rebid his clubsuit freely with a passing partner and 2 bidding opponents.
John
#9
Posted 2006-October-31, 07:10
1♣ (2♥) pass (3♥)
3♣
the 3♣ bid doesn't tell a min from a max, nor is there a need to because responder is weak and is bound to pass 90%+ of the time anyway. What opener lacks in extras is what opps have, so shape is the issue. You can bid with any min hand because, since opps have a fit, opener is bound to find a fit in pard as well.
There's a case for using a good-bad 2NT after 2♥, but not to tell a min from a max. It's better used to show an offensive (bids direct suit) vs or defensive hand (bids via 2NT).
#10
Posted 2006-October-31, 07:24
My only concern about bidding 5♣ on this hand is that partner may play me for more playing strength than I have.
I bid 4♣ with or without the interference.
#11
Posted 2006-November-01, 06:23
In this case, I will miss a lay down grand slam if I don´t move. I think, that I will produce at least 2 tricks for him and believe, that I have three, a spade, a club and a diamond ruff.
So I would proceed with a strong move. I guess 4 Club is passable and it is not standard to play 4 diamond here as KC, so I simply bid 5 Club.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#12
Posted 2006-November-03, 05:22
My hand was:
AJ
-
AKxx
KT8xxxx
Everything was favourable (my LHO had Qx in clubs with a doubleton diamonds, RHO had the spade K). The field played 3, 4 and 5 clubs, mostly making 13 tricks (420 for scoring only 12 tricks in 5♣ was about 65%). When my partner passed 3♥ I chose a conservative pass (I would have raised 4 or 5♣ a level), and 150 for 3 down earned us a fat zero, followed by several 170's and 190's
John

Help
