BBO Discussion Forums: Lead verus 3N - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lead verus 3N

#1 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,724
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2006-October-20, 08:21

Here's an interesting hand from yesterday:

You hold



RHO opens 1N and you overcall 2.
LHO bids 3N which ends the auction.

Name your poison and explain why
Alderaan delenda est
0

#2 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2006-October-20, 08:47

I'm assuming 3N denies a stop?

Just a small spade. My spots and my entries aren't good enough to try a high spade and spear a stiff J or K in dummy. If I give declarer #9 with the lead, thats life. I think its way more likely pard has a doubleton spade and declarer needs to knock out a card for 9.

At MPs I think I'd stay off a spade lead, but it's not clear.

Pard has roughly 2 to 7 points. Even if pard has clubs (which is a long shot), its far from clear I should lead them.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#3 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,658
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2006-October-20, 08:56

A non spade requires that partner have either the Jx(x) or that the suit be 2=2 in the opps's hands and that partner has 3 of them (or the are 1=2 and partner have an even less probable 4 card holding).

If I were to lead a non-, it would be a , since dummy may well hold a good minor but will not hold 4+.

However, the realistic lead (altho, I suspect, not the winning lead) is a low .

PS I am also assuming, as does Phil, that 3N denies a stop: if it promised a stop I'd lead the Q while if is was uninformative, I'd lead a low
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#4 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2006-October-20, 09:05

Low spade, and live with it.
I'm not going to get hung up over the whole 'promises or denies' thing. I play 3NT in this auction as "showing" a stop (I can bid 2NT then 3NT to deny) but if 3NT looks like the right call I'll bid 3NT holding, say, Jxx if there's no real prospect of playing anywhere else.
0

#5 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,915
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-October-20, 09:05

Hi,

spade, small.

Declarer most likely will hold KJx,
i.e. waiting to get partner on lead, wont
establish the suit, if you lead anything
else, you bet on it that declarer has only
one stopper.
The risk that giving away a spade trick
is also present, if you lead something
different.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#6 User is offline   Flame 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,085
  • Joined: 2004-March-26
  • Location:Israel

Posted 2006-October-20, 09:12

If 3NT show stop i lead the Q if it deny stoper Ill lead a small .
0

#7 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2006-October-20, 09:30

IF we're afraid of giving away a trick (which we certainly do if we lead it), seems the only alternative. LHO hasn't tried to find a fit, and opener has maximum 4 or 5.

I think I'm not that afraid, so I'll lead a small .
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#8 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-October-20, 10:00

I disagree with the Q lead even if LHO had promised the K. The problem is it only works if declarer misguesses which defender has the entry.

I think in all cases that matter partner has a doubleton, and not the Jack. Now if
- dummy has Kx and declarer has Jxx, low wins, and queen loses if declarer ducks
- dummy has Kxx and declarer has Jx, low loses, but queen only wins if declarer covers with the K - why should he?

I think Queen from holdings like this one can only be right if we have an entry.

Arend
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#9 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2006-October-20, 13:26

I would lead a spade too but I know the hand obviously :P
0

#10 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-October-20, 14:30

Q -- I suppose this can blow a trick if dummy has JXX and declarer has Kx, but caters to many other holdings.
foobar on BBO
0

#11 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-October-20, 14:32

akhare, on Oct 20 2006, 10:30 PM, said:

Q -- I suppose this can blow a trick if dummy has JXX and declarer has Kx, but caters to many other holdings.

Which one?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#12 User is offline   Flame 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,085
  • Joined: 2004-March-26
  • Location:Israel

Posted 2006-October-21, 00:32

cherdano, on Oct 20 2006, 03:32 PM, said:

akhare, on Oct 20 2006, 10:30 PM, said:

Q -- I suppose this can blow a trick if dummy has JXX and declarer has Kx, but caters to many other holdings.

Which one?

Your points about not leading the Q is good, but its far from obvious to declarer to find the duck when needed and sometimes even the duck wont help because he wont have enough tricks for the 3NT.
I think if if the K is marked with LHO leading the Q will win more then leading small' yet i agree it got less to win then i initially thought and i wont lead it unless im sure the K is there.
0

#13 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2006-October-21, 10:35

Leading the Q doesn't pay off. If dummy has Kxx and declarer has Jx, holding up is routine.

But leading the Q could be detrimental if declarer has KJx and pard a doubleton. Pard will probably place declarer with AKx and pard may make a desparate shift when the spade suit is cashing.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#14 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-October-21, 11:32

pclayton, on Oct 21 2006, 06:35 PM, said:

But leading the Q could be detrimental if declarer has KJx and pard a doubleton. Pard will probably place declarer with AKx and pard ay make a desparate shift when the spade suit is cashing.

Declarer can also duck with KJx. Really, the queen lead only works when partner's entry is an ace (in which case I admit declarer may well misguess). Otherwise declarer knows who has the entry and has to find the duck.

Arend
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

10 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 10 guests, 0 anonymous users